| Summary: | =www-apps/dspam-web-3.10.2: version bump for perl 5.16 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | jack_mort <jackmort37> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Web Application Packages Maintainers <web-apps> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
jack_mort
2012-07-02 19:04:03 UTC
Not quite a bug. See 'perldoc perl5120delta' and 'perldoc perl5160delta' (search for ctime.pl). For this particular function, it *seems* POSIX::ctime is the proper substitute. Are these CGI scripts part of a package Gentoo distributes? In other words, is there anything we can actually do about this? Yes, I get these errors from dspam-web cgi script. As far as dspam-web goes, this is a version bump request to 3.10.2. See http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dspam/dspam;a=commitdiff;h=91f8435a7b59554f14b96329368a2df6f7614238. Sorry my bad, I spend hours googling for my problem and couldn't come to this bug report on dspam... So I guess you can cancel this bug report and accept my apologies ! (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry my bad, I spend hours googling for my problem and couldn't come to > this bug report on dspam... > So I guess you can cancel this bug report and accept my apologies ! Nah, version bump is still valid and given low manpower of the herd, it didn't happen that long ago. Closing as dspam-3.10.2-r1 is stable on all arches. |