Bug 423585

Summary:	Unmatched removal atom(s) in [...]/gentoo-x86/profiles/arch/m68k/package.mask: -<sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Ryan Hill (RETIRED) <rhill>
Component:	Eclasses	Assignee:	m68k team <m68k>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	trivial
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-06-26 05:08:09 UTC

Every time someone runs repoman -d for a package with an m68k keyword they see:

RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
--- Unmatched removal atom(s) in /home/dirtyepic/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles/arch/m68k/package.mask: -<sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1
--- Unmatched removal atom(s) in /home/dirtyepic/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles/arch/m68k/package.mask: -<sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1
--- Unmatched removal atom(s) in /home/dirtyepic/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles/arch/m68k/package.mask: -<sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1
--- Unmatched removal atom(s) in /home/dirtyepic/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles/arch/m68k/package.mask: -<sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1
--- Unmatched removal atom(s) in /home/dirtyepic/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles/arch/m68k/package.mask: -<sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1
--- Unmatched removal atom(s) in /home/dirtyepic/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles/arch/m68k/package.mask: -<sys-devel/binutils-2.18-r1

Is there some way to avoid this?

Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2012-08-23 21:36:31 UTC

should be all set now in the tree; thanks for the report!

Commit message: Drop old package.mask