Summary: | Request for push permission pms overlay | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Hosted Projects | Reporter: | Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge> |
Component: | PMS/EAPI | Assignee: | Gentoo Overlays Project <overlays> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | pms |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Andreas K. Hüttel
2012-06-21 13:17:25 UTC
assign bug to us, waiting for confirmation from the pms team (In reply to comment #1) > waiting for confirmation from the pms team Sorry for the delay, I had missed this. Push access is fine, of course. The question is if you still need it? to be honest, no, not right now :) I'll reopen sometime in the futre (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > waiting for confirmation from the pms team > > Sorry for the delay, I had missed this. > > Push access is fine, of course. The question is if you still need it? Just a note; we have a dvcs for a reason, personally I'm strongly of the view development of non-standard specs shouldn't be occurring in the mainline repo. Put another way, people don't ask for push access to torvalds repo. They branch from his, and set up their own space. (In reply to comment #4) > Just a note; we have a dvcs for a reason, personally I'm strongly of the > view development of non-standard specs shouldn't be occurring in the > mainline repo. > > Put another way, people don't ask for push access to torvalds repo. They > branch from his, and set up their own space. FYI with gitolite giving people write access to certain non-master branches is possible. That's a light-weight alternative. |