| Summary: | net-irc/anope version bump | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Raymond Jennings <shentino> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | adam, binki, god, jwbraun, luke, net-irc, om, Palme0927 |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | anope-2.0.6.ebuild | ||
|
Description
Raymond Jennings
2012-06-11 01:56:20 UTC
I'd recommend trying Atheme. What's atheme? (In reply to comment #2) > What's atheme? net-irc/atheme-services, http://atheme.net It's an alternate services package that has better ircd support and more/better features than Anope 1.9 Part of that reason is Anope 1.9 implemented many features from Atheme. Indeed, but I'm currently using anope and have a preexisting database. Does atheme's ircd support unrealircd's features like extended ban types and admin/owner channel bits +a/+q? (In reply to comment #4) > Indeed, but I'm currently using anope and have a preexisting database. > > Does atheme's ircd support unrealircd's features like extended ban types and > admin/owner channel bits +a/+q? It does support that and it also supports some of Unreal's new stuff like SASL and away-notify and account-notify (optionally, of course). It also supports converting an Anope database to the Atheme database format, though the Anope 1.9 -> Atheme converter can be a tiny bit buggy. I still think tracking the dev version of anope would introduce a bleeding edge version, especially considering how slow anope's stable branch updates. (In reply to comment #1) > I'd recommend trying Atheme. One reason jdhore is suggesting this is that he's on atheme's development team :-p. I think this bug should go to gurligebis. Any progress on this? Anope 2 has since been moved to stable and is no longer in development. Is there any way we can get the Gentoo developers to stop advertising their alternative software here? It's very off topic and unprofessional. Thanks It's now 2015 Version 1.8.7 is EOL and it's the only version in the tree. *poke**poke**poke* Guys? *** Bug 504766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 550774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 2.0.2 is current stable from upstream, as of now. https://github.com/anope/anope/tags *** Bug 481512 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 640706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 525394 [details]
anope-2.0.6.ebuild
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1eb2b264d55d3f76f745ff36ef065c08458933fd commit 1eb2b264d55d3f76f745ff36ef065c08458933fd Author: Brian Evans <grknight@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2019-02-06 20:51:08 +0000 Commit: Brian Evans <grknight@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-02-06 20:51:08 +0000 net-irc/anope: Version bump Non-maintainer commit Based heavily off of Palme's ebuild in the bug Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/420613 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.59, Repoman-2.3.12 Signed-off-by: Brian Evans <grknight@gentoo.org> net-irc/anope/Manifest | 1 + net-irc/anope/anope-2.0.6.ebuild | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net-irc/anope/files/anope-conf.d-v2 | 9 +++ net-irc/anope/metadata.xml | 15 ++++ 4 files changed, 182 insertions(+) |
