| Summary: | [kde-testing]Ebuild: kdesudo (new package) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | trejkaz |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | blake-r, jiri.tyr, john, kde, vladimir |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
Ebuild for app-admin/kdesudo
ebuild for app-admin/kdesudo-2.3 kdesudo-2.4.ebuild kdesudo-2.4-r1.ebuild kdesudo-2.5.1.ebuild kdesudo-2.6.ebuild app-admin/kdesudo |
||
|
Description
trejkaz
2004-02-17 15:32:51 UTC
Created attachment 25804 [details]
Ebuild for app-admin/kdesudo
This bug seems to be lingering forever. How hard is it to check in a working ebuild anyway? Development of kdesudo stopped nearly two years ago. I don't think this can go in portage... But it works, and I can't find any bugs. What's the problem, exactly? Our resources are very limited, and every package that we add to the tree - even if nearly bugfree - increases a bit our maintainance duties. For this reason we are forced to restrict the candidate ebuilds for inclusion to include only packages that adhere to certain standards: they must have a decent audience and be actively maintained. This can change in the future, if we increase our resources to those of - say - Debian. The ebuild is not lost, though, anyone can find it here in bugzilla and use it. It looks like there is some progress: http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php/KdeSudo?content=72106 It would be nice to have this ebuild in portage tree. Please re-open this bug. Created attachment 143767 [details]
ebuild for app-admin/kdesudo-2.3
Ebuild for app-admin/kdesudo-2.3.
*** Bug 210585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #8) > *** Bug 210585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** OK, so can you reopen this bug please? *** Bug 210585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Seems to be alive again. I'm going look at this soon. (In reply to comment #11) > Seems to be alive again. I'm going look at this soon. > Thanks. Created attachment 143884 [details]
kdesudo-2.4.ebuild
Ebuild for kdesudo-2.4.
Created attachment 144197 [details]
kdesudo-2.4-r1.ebuild
Dependency on >=app-admin/sudo-1.6.9_p12.
Is this supposed to work with kde 3.5.8?
I ran kcontrol under strace.
When I click 'System Administration' login manger,
and then click 'Administrator Mode',
kdesudo dialog box does display, and I enter my passwd, and click OK.
Then I am left to reselect the area of 'System Administration' but do not have administrative rights. When I click 'Administrator Mode', strace shows:
QLayout "unnamed" added to QVBox "m_body", which already has a layout passprompt
kcmshell (kdelibs): WARNING: Could not find module 'kdm'.
I am using the ebuild kdesudo-2.4-r1.ebuild, and to install I had to unmask and emerge the following package versions:
emerge --update --newuse --deep -ta app-admin/kdesudo
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] app-admin/kdesudo-2.4-r1 USE="arts -debug -xinerama"
[ebuild U ] app-admin/sudo-1.6.9_p14 [1.6.8_p12-r1]
[ebuild N ] sys-auth/pambase-20080318 USE="cracklib gnome -consolekit -debug -mktemp -passwdqc (-selinux)"
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/pam-0.99.10.0 [0.99.9.0]
(In reply to comment #15) > Is this supposed to work with kde 3.5.8? > > I ran kcontrol under strace. > When I click 'System Administration' login manger, > and then click 'Administrator Mode', > kdesudo dialog box does display, and I enter my passwd, and click OK. > Then I am left to reselect the area of 'System Administration' but do not have > administrative rights. When I click 'Administrator Mode', strace shows: > QLayout "unnamed" added to QVBox "m_body", which already has a layout > passprompt > kcmshell (kdelibs): WARNING: Could not find module 'kdm'. > > I am using the ebuild kdesudo-2.4-r1.ebuild, and to install I had to unmask and > emerge the following package versions: > > emerge --update --newuse --deep -ta app-admin/kdesudo > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild N ] app-admin/kdesudo-2.4-r1 USE="arts -debug -xinerama" > [ebuild U ] app-admin/sudo-1.6.9_p14 [1.6.8_p12-r1] > [ebuild N ] sys-auth/pambase-20080318 USE="cracklib gnome > -consolekit -debug -mktemp -passwdqc (-selinux)" > [ebuild U ] sys-libs/pam-0.99.10.0 [0.99.9.0] > You should contact the author of kdesudo: http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php/KdeSudo?content=72106 Created attachment 149492 [details]
kdesudo-2.5.1.ebuild
Ebuild for kdesudo-2.5.1.
Created attachment 150500 [details]
kdesudo-2.6.ebuild
Ebuild for kdesudo-2.6.
Ebuild for kdesudo-3.3.1 on kde 4.1 Created attachment 171447 [details]
app-admin/kdesudo
Comment on attachment 171447 [details]
app-admin/kdesudo
Ebuild for kdesudo-3.3.1 and kde 4.1
Comment on attachment 171447 [details]
app-admin/kdesudo
Ebuild for kdesudo-3.3.1 and kde 4.1
This ebuild is already in kde-testing (and kde-crazy) so add one of the overlays if you want to use this app. (this is an automated message based on filtering criteria that matched this bug) Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild submission. We also apologize for not being able to accomendate you on a timely manor. There are simply too many new packages. Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry into the overlay. So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this and submit your ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =) Because this is a mass message, we are also asking you to be patient with us. We anticipate a large number of requests in a short time. Thanks, On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team, Jeremy. [1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/ [2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq These days it's also possible to use sudo via kdesu itself. http://dev-loki.blogspot.com/2006/11/kdesu-with-sudo.html Sorry, I have refined my search to exclude [kde-* in the summary. Yeah, what's advantage of kdesudo over kdesu now? is it really worthy being kept? Sorry guys but its rater more safe to use kdesu which now even supports using sudo as backend. |
