Summary: | GCC 4.6 stabilization | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) <xarthisius> |
Component: | [OLD] GCC Porting | Assignee: | Please assign to toolchain <gcc-porting> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | alexander, andrew.bugs, esigra, kaikaikai, kegalym2, kripton, nikoli, O01eg, pacho, shentino, sparc, sven.koehler, zerochaos |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ, Tracker |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 346809, 403415, 410601, 412675, 415661, 418391, 418393, 418395, 418399, 418405, 418407, 418409, 418411, 418413, 418415, 418437, 418439, 418445, 418449, 419893, 419903, 419905, 423329, 435996, 451680, 454426, 457062 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 351648, 384529, 394889, 406939 |
Description
Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED)
2012-05-31 15:20:05 UTC
A while back I went through the 4.6 tracker and made a list of broken packages and their first working versions. I only got about halfway through before I was distracted by something else but it should still help. https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/gcc-porting/browser/STABLE-4.6 *** Bug 434676 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 444534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This one blocks bug 351648 (please add it to the list, thank you) Are we ready to go on this? Seems this bug is still being blocked by 346809 (In reply to comment #5) > Are we ready to go on this? +1 Apart from bug 401561 I don't see any obstacles I heard that 4.5 was EOLed upstream. I don't mind pushing this through. Arch ppl, please stabilize gcc-4.6.3. arm, please note bug #401561. I don't have arm hardware so we'll need some help with that bug. amd64 stable x86 stable ppc stable ppc64 stable (In reply to comment #9) > Arch ppl, please stabilize gcc-4.6.3. arm, please note bug #401561. I > don't have arm hardware so we'll need some help with that bug. I just tested it (and noted results in the bug), I can't replicate the ICE, everything is fine. Can anyone from the arm arch team test and confirm my results? ia64 stable sparc stable alpha stable I've reverted alpha stabilization wrt bug 451680 (In reply to comment #9) > Arch ppl, please stabilize gcc-4.6.3. arm, please note bug #401561. I > don't have arm hardware so we'll need some help with that bug. @dirtyepic: seems we have a lot of boostrap comparison failures...So, if we want to keep gcc:4.6 stable I think we should filter the flags that produces this error, or at least add an ewarn. What do you think about? (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Arch ppl, please stabilize gcc-4.6.3. arm, please note bug #401561. I > > don't have arm hardware so we'll need some help with that bug. > > @dirtyepic: seems we have a lot of boostrap comparison failures...So, if we > want to keep gcc:4.6 stable I think we should filter the flags that produces > this error, or at least add an ewarn. What do you think about? Alternatively, maybe just have it append-flags -fno-omit-frame-pointer which is reported to work. If you're talking about the pentium3 thing then it's on my todo list. this one might block https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451920 for arm? hopefully it'll be stable there soon here's one that arm-stabilization might depend on: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452768 arm stable Stable for HPPA. sh stable s390 stable @alpha, since bug 454426 is fixed, how sounds stabilize? alpha stable (In reply to Raúl Porcel from comment #29) > alpha stable Actually I've reverted it because i think i didn't test it properly :) After testing it correctly, alpha stable See bug #467274. |