| Summary: | app-office/unoconv bump | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Hans de Graaff <graaff> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Office Team <office> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://github.com/dagwieers/unoconv/issues/49 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
I will do it in following days, uless you find time to create git snapshot and commit it yourself :P (In reply to comment #1) > I will do it in following days, uless you find time to create git snapshot > and commit it yourself :P Was there any reason you created a git snapshot yourself rather than downloading a tarball based on the commitish? Nope I just don't like how the folders are created by the github export thingie. But if you want to base it from that go ahead. (In reply to comment #1) > I will do it in following days, uless you find time to create git snapshot > and commit it yourself :P I have found time! :-) I have also added myself as co-maintainer since I use this in production. Hope you don't mind. |
The current (20120327) version of unoconv fails to run at all because it does not find all required parts in our libreoffice setup: $ unoconv unoconv: Cannot find a suitable pyuno library and python binary combination in /usr/lib64/libreoffice ERROR: Please locate this library and send your feedback to: http://github.com/dagwieers/unoconv/issues No module named uno unoconv: Cannot find a suitable pyuno library and python binary combination in /usr/lib/libreoffice ERROR: Please locate this library and send your feedback to: http://github.com/dagwieers/unoconv/issues No module named uno unoconv: Cannot find a suitable office installation on your system. ERROR: Please locate your office installation and send your feedback to: http://github.com/dagwieers/unoconv/issues I've been discussing this with upstream (see URL), and this is fixed upstream as of 2012-05-16. Could you add a new version based on this commit? Also, it might be better to use a version like 0.5.20120516, so that it is clear that we base these releases on 0.5, and this will also work better when upstream releases proper versions again.