Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 416541

Summary: app-admin/eselect-boost-0.4 installs broken symlink on prefix
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Justin Lecher (RETIRED) <jlec>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Gentoo Prefix <prefix>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: cpp+disabled, dev-zero, hwoarang, SebastianLuther
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-05-18 18:01:35 UTC
 $ eselect boost list
Available boost versions:
  [1]   boost-1.46/default *

(SCISOFT) scisoft@scisoft64 /opt/scisoft64 $ eselect boost set 1
Removing symlinks from old version
Creating symlinks for boost-1.46/default

(SCISOFT) scisoft@scisoft64 /opt/scisoft64 $ ll usr/include/boost
lrwxrwxrwx 1 scisoft scisoft 30 May 18 19:57 usr/include/boost -> /opt/scisoft64boost-1_46/boost

Somehow /usr/include is missin
Comment 1 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2012-05-21 07:53:47 UTC
hi, could you please test the patch in bug 413447? Thanks.
Comment 2 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-05-21 08:41:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> hi, could you please test the patch in bug 413447? Thanks.

Doesn't apply cleanly, so I don't know whether it is the patch or my manual fixing.
Comment 3 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2012-05-21 09:59:44 UTC
Hmm, what exactly is the patch failure output?

PS, apply to gx86 instead of that in Prefix.
Comment 4 Fabian Groffen gentoo-dev 2012-05-21 10:55:32 UTC
eselect-boost got recently synced, so most likely an error was introduced there, looks like it misses the EPREFIX
Comment 5 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2012-05-21 11:02:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> eselect-boost got recently synced, so most likely an error was introduced
> there, looks like it misses the EPREFIX

OT: other attect ebuilds are libglade and boost-build
Comment 6 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-05-21 12:11:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm, what exactly is the patch failure output?
> 
> PS, apply to gx86 instead of that in Prefix.

I did that but it failed. But I made it work.
Still the prefix problem isn't fixed.
Comment 7 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2012-06-14 11:16:57 UTC
hi jlec, I have figured out the problem. Please try the new patch on bug 413447

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 413447 ***