Summary: | udftools-1.0.0_beta2 (New Package) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Mark Cox <coxhome> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Joachim Blaabjerg (RETIRED) <styx> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | coxhome, set.mailinglist |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Ebuild script for udftools
This is the Update alternate ebuild with a different name |
Description
Mark Cox
2002-06-25 07:03:02 UTC
Created attachment 1774 [details] Ebuild script for udftools See bug 4137 Update - Nothing Major just a bit cleaner. Created attachment 2095 [details]
This is the Update
Created attachment 2903 [details] alternate ebuild with a different name Foolishly, I made my own ebuild before looking for it in bugs. However, Marks ebuild seems to have been languishing for a while, so I am submiting mine. It is mostly the same, except all extraneous skel comments are gone, and I dont doc README, NEWS, and INSTALL (the first two files seem to be empty) Also, the name Mark chose seems to make my current emerge puke, so I used 'udftools-1.0.0b.ebuild' Dont care whos ebuild goes in, just hoping one does:) Paul set@pobox.com Sorry this took so long, I just forgot about it. I've lintool'ed, fixed and tested the last ebuild committed here (the one written by Paul Thompson), and it should appear as sys-apps/udftools on rsync servers within a couple of hours. Please test this, as it's masked. I'll close the bug report when I've gotten a couple of successful test reports. Thanks to both of you, Mark and Paul :) The mask is gone, tell me if it doesn't work. Thanks again |