Bug 40499

Summary:	gnome-extra/vino: Remote Desktop Project (krfb for Gnome)
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Ed Catmur <ed>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	enhancement	CC:	radek
Priority:	Lowest
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
URL:	http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsblame.cgi?file=vino/docs/remote-desktop.txt
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Attachments:	Initial ebuild Patch to fix compile error Bumped ebuild (version 0.14) Cleaned 0.14 ebuild

Description Ed Catmur 2004-02-05 09:22:31 UTC

As seen on Planet Gnome and http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/blog/

May need some work to separate the client (requires java <yuk>) and the server components, but it works for now.

(well, almost - you'll have to do a lsof -c vino-server to work out what port it's actually listening on)

Ebuild and patch for compile error to follow.

Comment 1 Ed Catmur 2004-02-05 09:23:07 UTC

Created attachment 25016 [details]
Initial ebuild

Comment 2 Ed Catmur 2004-02-05 09:24:06 UTC

Created attachment 25017 [details, diff]
Patch to fix compile error

Comment 3 Yi Quang (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-02-05 20:46:05 UTC

This should have little priority, pre-beta software.

Comment 4 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-02-06 03:34:14 UTC

my idea

Comment 5 Ed Catmur 2004-03-02 18:22:54 UTC

Created attachment 26740 [details]
Bumped ebuild (version 0.14)

Patch no longer needed.

Comment 6 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-03-03 01:32:44 UTC

@ the ebuild, the libbonobo dep tricks aren't really necessary, just depend on libbonobo alone -> it always implies bonobo-activation if needed.

let src_unpack & SRC_URI be handled by the gnome2 eclass.

Comment 7 Ed Catmur 2004-03-03 06:12:16 UTC

Created attachment 26766 [details]
Cleaned 0.14 ebuild

Changes made, thanks.

Comment 8 Robert Moss (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-08-07 19:01:28 UTC

This has now hit version 2.7.4 and has been propsed for the GNOME 2.8 modules list. Does someone fancy keeping tabs on this one to make sure the 2.8 jump doesn't wreak havoc?

http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/vino/NEWS?view=markup

Comment 9 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-08-11 06:04:01 UTC

cleaned up the proposed ebuild a bit & added net-misc/vino-2.7.4 to the tree p.mask-ed so it can get some testing.

Thanks for the effort.

Comment 10 gent_bz 2004-08-23 01:14:53 UTC

Forgive me if I've missed something (or this has changed in the 12 hours since my last emerge), but there is no net-misc/vino in portage even though vino is masked in package.mask

An oversight?

Comment 11 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-08-23 02:54:07 UTC

correct, i never did the final commit *duh*

Comment 12 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-08-23 02:55:18 UTC

now fixed & added 2.7.91 in the process