Summary: | sys-devel/crossdev stores EXTRA_ECONF options w/o quotes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | René Berber <r.berber> |
Component: | [OLD] Development | Assignee: | Embedded Gentoo Team <embedded> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
René Berber
2012-02-06 04:00:16 UTC
this is behaving (mostly) as intended idea was to do: --benv 'VAR="some values"\nSOMETHING="more stuff"' in your example below, there's no way of supporting multiple variables. obviously this won't work: --genv EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-multilib --enable-targets=all" CFLAGS="-pipe" you need to pass that in as a single argument: --genv 'EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-multilib --enable-targets=all" CFLAGS="-pipe"' i've added a little more info to the --help output http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/crossdev.git;a=commitdiff;h=17661edff9a8933975ada3f4b1448d132aa0f050 (In reply to comment #1) > this is behaving (mostly) as intended > > idea was to do: > --benv 'VAR="some values"\nSOMETHING="more stuff"' > > in your example below, there's no way of supporting multiple variables. > obviously this won't work: > --genv EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-multilib --enable-targets=all" CFLAGS="-pipe" [snip] And where did you get the CFLAGS from? I certainly didn't use it, and you seem to be missing the point: its multiple parameters not multiple environment variables. (In reply to comment #2) no, i'm afraid you seemed to miss the point. the --env flags take multiple variables, not just one you happen to want to set. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > no, i'm afraid you seemed to miss the point. the --env flags take multiple > variables, not just one you happen to want to set. My report is about multiple parameters set in one variable missing the required quotes. No mention of multiple variables. (In reply to comment #4) and i'm afraid you missed the point then. current behavior is working as intended. use the syntax i suggested to make it work for you. |