Bug 401699

Summary:	absent package(s) are masked in package.mask file
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	zvasylvv
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Gentoo Quality Assurance Team <qa>
Status:	RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Severity:	QA	CC:	fordfrog, hd_brummy, zzam
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Attachments:	package.mask.patch

Description zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:08:28 UTC

dev-java/netx package is absent in portage tree. however it still present in profiles/package.mask file.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:10:18 UTC

same for 


# Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org> (19 Oct 2011)
# Masked for removal on 19 Nov 2011
# Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377967
# Replaced by dev-java/jnlp-api
dev-java/jnlp-bin

Comment 2 zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:19:49 UTC

also

app-misc/openjnlp
media-tv/vdr-dvd-scripts
media-tv/vdrplugin-rebuild
centreon


Its possible that =media-plugins/xbmc-addon-vdr-9999 is also non existant, but more looks like its a typo (should be xbmc-addon-xvdr)

Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-01-31 21:30:08 UTC

Are you aware that developers can check these from

http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/
http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt

?

Comment 4 zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:35:58 UTC

No, I do not. I am in process of developing another software^W 'bicycle' :) that except other stuff shows also this info..

Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-01-31 22:33:56 UTC

Created attachment 300573 [details, diff]
package.mask.patch

Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-01-31 22:34:39 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> Are you aware that developers can check these from
> 
> http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/
> http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt

Maybe QA people should file bug reports.

Comment 7 Christian Ruppert (idl0r) gentoo-dev

2012-02-01 17:55:35 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 300573 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> package.mask.patch

Jer, feel free to commit :)

(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Are you aware that developers can check these from
> > 
> > http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/
> > http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt
> 
> Maybe QA people should file bug reports.

Hm, please rename that bug afterwards or file a new one. I may write a script for it.