|Summary:||dev-lang/fpc-2.6.0 USE=ide - fpcalc.pas(244,3) Fatal: Selected assembler reader not supported|
|Product:||Gentoo Linux||Reporter:||David W Noon <david.w.noon>|
|Component:||[OLD] Development||Assignee:||No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed>|
|Package list:||Runtime testing required:||---|
|Bug Depends on:||478690|
Full build log of FPC 2.6.0 (gzipped).
emerge --info details (gzipped)
Description David W Noon 2012-01-23 22:28:41 UTC
Created attachment 299683 [details] Full build log of FPC 2.6.0 (gzipped). The compilation of FPC's Borland-like IDE fails when it is requested by the ide USE flag. If I specify -ide the build works correctly, but no IDE is built of course. The build log is attached. The emerge --info details will follow in a few minutes.
Comment 1 David W Noon 2012-01-23 22:30:32 UTC
Created attachment 299685 [details] emerge --info details (gzipped)
Comment 2 Tim Harder 2012-02-14 22:08:45 UTC
Please add emerge --info details inline next time and don't compress plain text attachments.
Comment 3 David W Noon 2012-02-15 16:20:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #2) > Please add emerge --info details inline next time and don't compress plain text > attachments. The Bugzilla client often crashes when adding fairly large amounts of text inline. There is also a size limitation on each upload, and compression usually avoids such problems.
Comment 4 Julian Ospald 2013-06-26 22:50:20 UTC
does this happen with 2.6.2 as well?
Comment 5 David W Noon 2013-06-26 23:08:11 UTC
(In reply to Julian Ospald (hasufell) from comment #4) > does this happen with 2.6.2 as well? 2.6.2 is not yet in the Portage tree. I can try and build 2.6.2 from a download from the FPC project's FTP server, but I'm not sure how accurately that reflects using an ebuild.
Comment 6 Julian Ospald 2013-06-27 00:12:11 UTC
(In reply to David W Noon from comment #5) > (In reply to Julian Ospald (hasufell) from comment #4) > > does this happen with 2.6.2 as well? > > 2.6.2 is not yet in the Portage tree. > It is, resync.
Comment 7 David W Noon 2013-06-27 16:09:30 UTC
(In reply to Julian Ospald (hasufell) from comment #4) > does this happen with 2.6.2 as well? It is fixed in 2.6.2.
Comment 8 Julian Ospald 2013-06-27 16:16:28 UTC
then we will close this when 2.6.2 hits stable
Comment 9 David W Noon 2016-01-25 19:11:45 UTC
Since 2.6.4 has been stable for some time, this bug can be safely closed.