| Summary: | media-sound/pulseaudio - module-tunnel-sink is unreliable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Victor Mataré <vmatare+gbug> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Sound Team <sound> |
| Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | christoph.gysin, sound |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Victor Mataré
2011-12-15 23:32:05 UTC
You can read the reply to the email you pointed to for upstream's take on the issue -- http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2011-December/012478.html (tl;dr: misbehaving clients become much more apparent on network sinks, and there's a lot of those that we have no control over. Also, the network sink needs some love, but there isn't anyone volunteering to work on it at the moment.) With that out of the way, are you saying that stream moves to a tunnel sink worked fine at some point? If yes, some more information (like what what version it last worked in) would be helpful. > With that out of the way, are you saying that stream moves to a tunnel sink > worked fine at some point? If yes, some more information (like what what > version it last worked in) would be helpful. Nope, I never tried tunneling a network sink before, but as I read it, the unreliability is simply due to the current status of tunnel and client code. I think the shortcut to fixing the issue is in this forum post: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=6914120#6914120 Colin also stated on pulseaudio-discuss that re-implementing the old, reliable functionality of telling the client to connect to a networked server via the PULSE_SERVER property of the X11 root window should be straightforward. This could be easily implemented in pasystray and we'd have a quick solution while module-tunnel-sink is being fixed (which will take some time I think). Is this still valid with latest pulseaudio? (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #3) > Is this still valid with latest pulseaudio? |