Bug 392281 – sys-apps/openrc: net Bridge gets destroyed before unmounting nfs shares

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED NEEDINFO

[Description Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-11-28 14:23:37 UTC]

I have configured a bridge including only eth0. During shutdown the bridge gets destroyed before unmounting any nfs share, which lets the system hang.

Current configuration, which should work from all I see from the docs:

/etc/conf.d/net:

config_eth0="null"
rc_need_br0="net.eth0"
bridge_br0="eth0"

config_br0="134.94.119.22/23 brd 134.94.119.255"
routes_br0="default via 134.94.118.1"
fallback_br0="dhcp"
dhcpcd_br0="-t 60"

brctl_br0="
   setfd 0
   sethello 0
   stp off"

/etc/rc.conf:
rc_depend_strict="YES"

[Comment 1 William Hubbs 2011-12-16 23:30:56 UTC]

(In reply to comment #0)
> I have configured a bridge including only eth0. During shutdown the bridge gets
> destroyed before unmounting any nfs share, which lets the system hang.
> 
> Current configuration, which should work from all I see from the docs:
> 
> /etc/conf.d/net:
> 
> config_eth0="null"
> rc_need_br0="net.eth0"

What if you add the following line below the rc_need above:

rc_need_netmount="net.br0"

Does that work?

[Comment 2 William Hubbs 2011-12-17 02:24:37 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > I have configured a bridge including only eth0. During shutdown the bridge gets
> > destroyed before unmounting any nfs share, which lets the system hang.
> > 
> > Current configuration, which should work from all I see from the docs:
> > 
> > /etc/conf.d/net:
> > 
> > config_eth0="null"
> > rc_need_br0="net.eth0"
> 
> What if you add the following line below the rc_need above:
> 
> rc_need_netmount="net.br0"

Slight correction:

rc_need_netmount="!net net.br0"

[Comment 3 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-12-17 14:21:04 UTC]

I resetuped the whole box, and now it is fine. The only difference which I can spot, is that on the old setup, I had net.eth0 additionally in runlevel=boot activated.

[Comment 4 Robin Johnson 2011-12-26 23:52:39 UTC]

Did you test the rc_need change that was proposed?

[Comment 5 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-12-27 08:00:44 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> Did you test the rc_need change that was proposed?

Sadly not.
Perhaps we should close this bug, as I cannot reproduce it anymore.

[Comment 6 Robin Johnson 2011-12-27 08:09:58 UTC]

Ok, closing then.