Summary: | qmail SPAMControl patch available, suggest adding to qmail ebuilds | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | elfarto <elfarto69> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Net-Mail Packages <net-mail+disabled> |
Status: | VERIFIED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | vapier |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/spamcontrol.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 29485 |
Description
elfarto
2004-01-21 16:02:02 UTC
most of the stuff on this list is already included in my qmail ebuilds. somebody submitted this once before, but that was at least 6 months ago. if you want to find that bug, and go thru the latest qmail -r15 ebuild to check which of this stuff isn't there, i'll be happy to add it into our ebuild. off the top of my head: relaymailfrom - i'm not adding this bad* filters SMTP SIZE SMTP AUTH - normally allowed after TLS only, there is a use flag to allow it before Split Horizon evaluation of badhelo and badmailfrom - double check this NULLSENDER single RECIPIENT enforcement Limit size of bounces Russel Nelson's double bounce trim - double check this Bruce Guenter's Bigtodo patch I'll be glad to see a dynamic tarpit patch included into future ebuilds, the normal tarpit.patch available is just too dumb to be of any utility against decided spammers, it allows the client to continue sending data even while the sleep loop is running. It seems that the tarpit patch included in spamcontrol is of no use either. Perhaps http://spamthrottle.qmail.ca/ should be the right thing to add to the ebuild. Sorry for my mistake. Should i open a new bug ? elfarto: yes open a new bug. closing this as we have most of it. Most of it but not: Recipient Whitelising Extension: Accept E-Mails on a per-user bases, instead of per-domain. This is a critical patch IMO and will prevent tons of mail for non-existent users ending up in the queue and using up bandwidth. You can use SPP for that. |