Bug 387521 – <app-antivirus/clamav-0.97.3: recursion level crash (CVE-2011-3627)

• Product: Gentoo Security
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Hanno Böck 2011-10-18 10:37:29 UTC]

Sadly, clamav doesn't issue security advisories since a long time.

According to ChangeLog, this sounds like a security issue:
 * libclamav/bytecode.c,bytecode_api.c: fix recursion level crash (bb #3706).

Upstream bug is invisible to the public. I'll request a CVE on oss-security.

[Comment 1 Tim Sammut (RETIRED) 2011-10-18 14:48:13 UTC]

Thanks, Hanno.

@net-mail or @antivirus, 0.97.3 is already in the tree. Ok to stabilize it?

[Comment 2 Tim Harder 2011-10-18 16:47:32 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks, Hanno.
> 
> @net-mail or @antivirus, 0.97.3 is already in the tree. Ok to stabilize it?

Yes, arches go ahead.

[Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-10-18 17:00:12 UTC]

Arches, please test and mark stable:

=app-antivirus/clamav-0.97.3
target KEYWORDS : "alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86"

[Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-10-18 22:38:41 UTC]

looks perfect on a server, amd64 ok

[Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-10-19 09:21:20 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 6 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2011-10-19 10:45:43 UTC]

amd64:

all ok

[Comment 7 Tony Vroon (RETIRED) 2011-10-19 11:06:24 UTC]

+  19 Oct 2011; Tony Vroon <[e-mail]> clamav-0.97.3.ebuild:
+  Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Agostino "ago" Sarubbo & Ian
+  "idella4" Delaney in security bug #387521.

[Comment 8 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2011-10-22 07:18:52 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 9 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2011-10-22 11:57:20 UTC]

alpha/ia64/sparc stable

[Comment 10 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-10-22 19:08:10 UTC]

We'll need toc workaround[1] for ppc64 before stabilizing, you're ok if I add it?
I'm pretty sure it wasn't needed before :/

[1] use ppc64 && append-flags -mminimal-toc

[Comment 11 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-10-23 08:24:34 UTC]

ppc/ppc64 stable, last arch done

[Comment 12 Tim Sammut (RETIRED) 2011-10-23 14:34:33 UTC]

Thanks, everyone. Added to pending GLSA request.

[Comment 13 GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot 2011-10-23 14:59:36 UTC]

This issue was resolved and addressed in
 GLSA 201110-20 at http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201110-20.xml
by GLSA coordinator Tim Sammut (underling).

[Comment 14 Nick Bowler 2011-10-24 02:28:16 UTC]

The posted GLSA (http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201110-20.xml)
says:

  Vulnerable version: < 0.97.3
  [...]
  NOTE: This is a legacy GLSA. Updates for all affected architectures are
  available since August 27, 2011. It is likely that your system is already no
  longer affected by this issue. 

Since 0.97.3 was added to the tree only 5 days ago, it seems impossible that
any updates were available on August 27, 2011.

[Comment 15 Tim Sammut (RETIRED) 2011-10-24 15:46:52 UTC]

(In reply to comment #14)
> The posted GLSA (http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201110-20.xml)
> says:
> 
>   Vulnerable version: < 0.97.3
>   [...]
>   NOTE: This is a legacy GLSA. Updates for all affected architectures are
>   available since August 27, 2011. It is likely that your system is already no
>   longer affected by this issue. 
> 
> Since 0.97.3 was added to the tree only 5 days ago, it seems impossible that
> any updates were available on August 27, 2011.

Thanks for letting me know, Nick. I have corrected the advisory and it should show up online shortly.

http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201110-20.xml

[Comment 16 GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot 2011-11-18 06:19:20 UTC]

CVE-2011-3627 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3627):
  The bytecode engine in ClamAV before 0.97.3 allows remote attackers to cause
  a denial of service (crash) via vectors related to "recursion level" and (1)
  libclamav/bytecode.c and (2) libclamav/bytecode_api.c.