Summary: | media-libs/phonon-4.5.0 fails to compile after upgrade to >=pulseaudio-1.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | hirakendu <hirakendu> |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Gentoo KDE team <kde> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | eXt, ford_prefect, myk002, stefanhetzwaantje |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-commit/2011-08/msg01086.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
patch to make phonon-4.5.0 with >=pulseaudio-1.0
ebuild that uses the phonon patch for pulseaudio |
Description
hirakendu
2011-10-09 04:33:59 UTC
Created attachment 289285 [details]
patch to make phonon-4.5.0 with >=pulseaudio-1.0
Created attachment 289287 [details]
ebuild that uses the phonon patch for pulseaudio
@hirakendu, thank you, your patch works! The fix is already upstream at: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdesupport/phonon/phonon/repository/revisions/436d5379abe83c53c652d8a251f7ab504a1523df Could someone from KDE team like to apply this? I can add it to latest phonon if you're strapped for time. Fix added in phonon-4.5.0-r1, thanks to everyone involved and sorry this took so long. (In reply to comment #5) > Fix added in phonon-4.5.0-r1, thanks to everyone involved and sorry this took > so long. Andreas, is there a reason why you removed phonon-4.5.0-[r1,r2] from the portage tree? I see in the ChangeLog that you did a "cleanup", which means that phonon gets downgraded to =4.5.0, which still has this bug. Here are the lines from the ChangeLog I'm talking about: > 30 Nov 2011; Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> > -phonon-4.5.0-r1.ebuild, -phonon-4.5.0-r2.ebuild, -phonon-4.5.1.ebuild: > Cleanup Perhaps it's an idea to reopen this bug until the ebuilds get back in the tree? (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Fix added in phonon-4.5.0-r1, thanks to everyone involved and sorry this took > > so long. > > Andreas, is there a reason why you removed phonon-4.5.0-[r1,r2] from the > portage tree? I see in the ChangeLog that you did a "cleanup", which means that > phonon gets downgraded to =4.5.0, which still has this bug. > > Here are the lines from the ChangeLog I'm talking about: > > 30 Nov 2011; Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> > > -phonon-4.5.0-r1.ebuild, -phonon-4.5.0-r2.ebuild, -phonon-4.5.1.ebuild: > > Cleanup > > Perhaps it's an idea to reopen this bug until the ebuilds get back in the tree? Maybe I'm missing something, but why dont you upgrade to 4.5.1-r1 ? > Maybe I'm missing something, but why dont you upgrade to 4.5.1-r1 ?
You're not really missing anything, but 4.5.1-r1 is keyword masked (at least on amd64), which means users get a broken package as one of the two only stable versions.
(In reply to comment #8) > > Maybe I'm missing something, but why dont you upgrade to 4.5.1-r1 ? > > You're not really missing anything, but 4.5.1-r1 is keyword masked (at least on > amd64), which means users get a broken package as one of the two only stable > versions. Yes, but both versions that I removed were keyword masked too. So? :) (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but why dont you upgrade to 4.5.1-r1 ? > > > > You're not really missing anything, but 4.5.1-r1 is keyword masked (at least on > > amd64), which means users get a broken package as one of the two only stable > > versions. > > Yes, but both versions that I removed were keyword masked too. So? :) That is indeed something I overlooked :) But in the meantime, another wild bug has appeared that is a duplicate of this one: #393457. Please disregard anything else I might have said that sounds like utter nonsense ;) Hitting this one also. Could you please get those patches in again? *** Bug 393457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |