Summary: | app-editors/emacs-21.4-r23 and -22.3-r8 compilation fails with media-libs/libpng-1.5* | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ulrich Müller <ulm> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Emacs project <emacs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 354479 |
Description
Ulrich Müller
2011-09-26 19:07:34 UTC
Time for last rites for SLOTs 21 and 22, or should we backport the fix from Emacs 23? <ssuominen> ulm: need patches for those slots? <ssuominen> don't want to waste time if they are getting lastrited, but ... <ssuominen> don't want emacs to become a bottleneck for libpng15 stabilization either. <ulm> ssuominen: I don't really intend to fix them <ulm> but let's wait for fauli's opinion on the matter <ssuominen> k <ulm> ssuominen: if we decide on fixing it, I think this is the patch that has to be backported: http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/emacs/emacs-23/revision/100432 <ssuominen> ulm: they seem to go through extra hoops for Windows build on that one, otherwise a 2-liner patch would solve the build problems, replacing png_ptr->jmpbuf with png_jmpbuf(png_ptr) (In reply to comment #2) > a 2-liner patch would solve the build problems, replacing png_ptr->jmpbuf > with png_jmpbuf(png_ptr) Right, the patch is trivial: <http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/emacs/22.3/10_all_libpng15.patch?view=markup> Therefore fixed, without revbump. |