| Summary: | sci-biology/bfast-0.6.5a uses einstall instead of emake install | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Andrey Kislyuk (RETIRED) <weaver> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | sci-biology |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 384345 | ||
|
Description
Agostino Sarubbo
2011-09-24 23:31:13 UTC
Why should I use emake install instead of einstall? From devmanual: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/src_install/index.html einstall should be use in particural cases when the buildsystem installs file in a wrong path. So, I've done: emerge bfast qlist -e bfast >> /tmp/list1 edit the ebuild replacing einstall with emake install emerge bfast qlist -e bfast >> /tmp/list1 diff list1 list2 does not show any changement, so there is no reason to use einstall ;) sorry, the second is list2, but I guess that the concept is clear =) Version is removed from tree. |