| Summary: | SELinux Pollicy files for Snort 2.0.6 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Security | Reporter: | Bill McCarty <bmccarty> | ||||||||
| Component: | Vulnerabilities | Assignee: | Chris PeBenito (RETIRED) <pebenito> | ||||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||||||||||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||||||||||
| Priority: | High | ||||||||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Bill McCarty
2004-01-13 23:55:40 UTC
Created attachment 23783 [details]
Snort TE file
Created attachment 23784 [details]
Snort FC file
Hmm, it looks like you could change the log_domain(snort) into a logdir_domain(snort), and then the extra logging lines you added at the bottom can be removed. Would you test this to make sure? Otherwise it looks good. Created attachment 23810 [details]
SELinux TE file for Snort
Revised to use logdir_domain(), eliminating need for two allows related to
logging.
Also revised to include permissions necessary for startup via run_init.
committed to policy cvs committed to portage |