Summary: | Version bump x11-wm/fvwm-2.6.2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jesús Guerrero Botella (RETIRED) <i92guboj> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Jesús Guerrero Botella (RETIRED) <i92guboj> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | darkside |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.fvwm.org/news/#2.6.2 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Jesús Guerrero Botella (RETIRED)
![]() Is renaming 2.6.1 ebuild to 2.6.2 all that is needed? (In reply to comment #1) > Is renaming 2.6.1 ebuild to 2.6.2 all that is needed? As said above, that should suffice according to my tests. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Is renaming 2.6.1 ebuild to 2.6.2 all that is needed? > > As said above, that should suffice according to my tests. Oh, sorry. Didn't read that closely. I added .2 and remove .1 now since you say it has bugs. Remember to file a stablereq once you think there is a version that is suitable. +*fvwm-2.6.2 (08 Aug 2011) + + 08 Aug 2011; Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> -fvwm-2.5.30.ebuild, + -fvwm-2.6.1.ebuild, +fvwm-2.6.2.ebuild: + Version bump, bug 378251 - tested by Jesús Guerrero (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Is renaming 2.6.1 ebuild to 2.6.2 all that is needed? > > > > As said above, that should suffice according to my tests. > > Oh, sorry. Didn't read that closely. I added .2 and remove .1 now since you say > it has bugs. Remember to file a stablereq once you think there is a version > that is suitable. 2.6.2 is a good candidate for that, so I'll remind you in a month ;) I didn't file it against 2.6.1 because it has an useless menu script (I can't really say when did it break) and also because I discovered the FvwmButtons bug and I knew that a fix was in the way. Thanks for your quick response. :) |