Summary: | www-client/elinks-9999 ebuild | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Kevin Faulkner <kondor6c> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | anton.kochkov, pchrist, proxy-maint, raphael.droz+floss |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
www-client/elinks-9999 ebuild
Configure script failure elinks git ebuild www-client/elinks-9999 ebuild www-client/elinks-9999 ebuild www-client/elinks-9999.ebuild |
Description
Anton Kochkov
2011-06-29 03:57:08 UTC
Created attachment 284423 [details] Configure script failure (In reply to comment #0) It doesn't compile for me. It doesn't even produce working configure script (take a look at build.log). I have tried to compile it outside of the portage: git clone ... -> ./autogen.sh -> ./configure -> make and it results with working configure script and compiles normally. (In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 284423 [details] > Configure script failure > > (In reply to comment #0) > It doesn't compile for me. It doesn't even produce working configure script > (take a look at build.log). > > I have tried to compile it outside of the portage: > > git clone ... -> ./autogen.sh -> ./configure -> make > > and it results with working configure script and compiles normally. added "sh ./autogen.sh" string, this is an ugly trick, but it works! Created attachment 284449 [details]
elinks git ebuild
Created attachment 284653 [details]
www-client/elinks-9999 ebuild
Here is nice fixed version of ebuild - and it is working ok.
http://elinks.cz/download.html seems to indicate that http://elinks.cz/elinks.git as the repository - is Git elinks compatible with spidermonkey 1.8.5 (I hope so) ? then "javascript? ( dev-lang/spidermonkey )" would be really nice. - EAPI=4 ? - AFAIK we use KEYWORDS="" for -9999 ebuild isn't ? - git or git-2 eclass ? (In reply to comment #5) > http://elinks.cz/download.html seems to indicate that > http://elinks.cz/elinks.git as the repository > > - is Git elinks compatible with spidermonkey 1.8.5 (I hope so) ? then > "javascript? ( dev-lang/spidermonkey )" would be really nice. > > - EAPI=4 ? > > - AFAIK we use KEYWORDS="" for -9999 ebuild isn't ? > > - git or git-2 eclass ? All fixed, but http://elinks.cz/elinks.git doesnt work, so I'm using old git uri: git://repo.or.cz/w/elinks.git Created attachment 285171 [details]
www-client/elinks-9999 ebuild
Created attachment 285179 [details]
www-client/elinks-9999.ebuild
Thank you, it works fine for me with spidermonkey 1.8.5 (tested with a basic JS redirection) Now I just feel strange that: - elinks.conf sample disappeared (URL about sample.conf files policy ?) - this ebuild-9999 contains calls to epatch with non-distro specific patches :) (In reply to comment #9) > Thank you, it works fine for me with spidermonkey 1.8.5 (tested with a basic JS > redirection) > > Now I just feel strange that: > - elinks.conf sample disappeared (URL about sample.conf files policy ?) > - this ebuild-9999 contains calls to epatch with non-distro specific patches :) hm. looks like elinks tree doesnt have sample.conf now. These patches taken from older elinks ebuild. We don't normally add *just* live ebuilds in the tree. Is it really necessary to have an ebuild for this package which at at the very early stages of development? No comments from maintainer about this in some months, proxies refused to commit this. Closing as WONTFIX |