Summary: | sys-apps/lsb-release, dev-libs/protobuf, media-sound/mumble straight from ecopy (one line needs commenting out for mumble) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo/Alt | Reporter: | Peter Waller <p> |
Component: | Prefix Support | Assignee: | Gentoo Prefix <prefix> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Patch for mumble.ebuild
Fix plugin path |
Description
Peter Waller
2011-04-21 11:07:54 UTC
I'm not sure if lsb_release can be ecopied like that. I'm not sure what it should report, but probably that you're running a Gentoo Prefix system on top of the host system. I'm quite sure lsb guys didn't think of something like that to ever happen. Ah, yes. When I run it, it reports "n/a", so clearly it doesn't work. lsb_release is also available on the host system.. However, it is a dependency of mumble, and mumble compiles fine. Maybe mumble could be masked with a message that lsb_release should be put in the etc/make.profile/packages.provided? Created attachment 270775 [details, diff]
Fix plugin path
Another thing I missed out.
lsb_release can't be "ported" because it would mean we claim to have a LSB-compliant system, which a Prefix imo is far from. I don't know what mumble does with it, or better, without it. Closing ancient. |