Summary: | app-arch/duff-0.4 can't handle >2GB size files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jesse Adelman <jesse> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Jesse Adelman
2011-03-20 21:34:14 UTC
I wrote to the upstream author, and here is the response (it's good news): "From: Camilla Berglund <elmindreda@elmindreda.se> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesse Adelman <jesse@boldandbusted.com> Subject: Re: duff and 2GB+ size files? References: <4D868A5D.4060304@boldandbusted.com> In-Reply-To: <4D868A5D.4060304@boldandbusted.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Truedomain-Domain: elmindreda.se X-Truedomain-SPF: No Record X-Truedomain-DKIM: No Signature X-Truedomain-ID: C4FDB778B5F2760609958F8CA9560640 X-Truedomain: Neutral Jesse Adelman wrote: > It appears that duff may not be happy checking files larger than > 2GB. Yup. I've been neglecting duff for far too long. However, the fix for this particular issue is already in the SF.net Git repository[1]. [1] http://sourceforge.net/scm/?type=git&group_id=138325 > If Gentoo's build recipe is wrong, or I am wrong to expect 2GB+ file > size support, please let me know in the most gentlest of terms. No, you're quite right to expect it. It was an oversight on my part to assume that off_t was 64-bit by default on all relevant platforms. > P.S. The development CVS repo for duff appears to have disappeared, so > your link is broken from duff's project page. Oups, I forgot to update the page after moving to Git. Thank you! I'm glad to see people still using duff. I'll see about making a new release. There's been a few additions since 0.4. Regards, elmindreda" Sweet! :) Version 0.5 is out. Your bug request should be fixed now: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359667 |