| Summary: | IRC clients should specify a Gentoo-specific username | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sean Egan <sean.egan> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Packages in net-irc <net-irc> |
| Status: | VERIFIED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | abhishek, avenj, brad, dberkholz, klasikahl, kutsuya, mkennedy, piman, scox, sean.egan, solar, spider, thekingant |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | Removes support from the component causing the error. | ||
|
Description
Sean Egan
2003-12-15 12:11:44 UTC
you gotta be kidding me on a side not, if you have real beef with something Gentoo is doing with respect to Gaim, please contact gaim-bugs@gentoo.org this is too funny, you've taken the crown of being the biggest jack ass I've seen this year. well done, I think. There's a pretty funny "stereotypical gentoo user" guide around, I think you nearly quoted it. Sure lets rush out an edit every single IRC client ebuild in portage so the gaim lead dev does not have to deal with gentoo users reporting bugs. This has to be worst initial contact I think anybody could have made. Not sure I expect much more out of somebody that codes for AOL software. I hope to see this bug make the GWN for an example of what an INVALID bug looks like or for seemants jackass award. "Lindows.com, a proud gaim supporter!" <- this could explain Could you guys please have a little more respect? You don't need to respond in kind. please, I'm chuckling here. So far its the funniest troll this month. i do not know which is funnier, that sean actually submitted this bug, or that you all are so stereotypically gentoo users as to take it seriously. yawn
just to let you know I just built gaim with debug and got this nice backtrace if I try to reconnect to icq...
#0 gaim_connection_get_account (gc=0x23) at connection.c:416
#1 0x10060ec4 in signed_on_off_cb (gc=0x0, dialog=0x1034d948)
at gtkaccount.c:1351
#2 0x10043d74 in gaim_marshal_VOID__POINTER (cb=0x42004824, args=0x8,
data=0x100a1ff4, return_val=0x100a3c3c) at signals.c:569
#3 0x100437b8 in gaim_signal_emit_vargs (instance=0x0,
signal=0x10352ea0 "\0205K`", args=0x7fff8f40) at signals.c:446
#4 0x100436c0 in gaim_signal_emit (instance=0x10060ec4,
signal=0x10060ec4 "|~\exH\006P\021|\177\ex\200|") at signals.c:405
#5 0x100251d0 in gaim_connection_set_state (gc=0x100e3788, state=8)
at connection.c:333
#6 0x0e9512fc in gaim_bosrights (sess=0x10352ea0, fr=0x1035be08)
at oscar.c:3849
#7 0x0e92e044 in rights (sess=0x7fff8f40, mod=0x8, rx=0x100e3788,
snac=0x10352ea0, bs=0x19e) at bos.c:44
#8 0x0e92e2dc in snachandler (sess=0x0, mod=0x8, rx=0x100a1ff4,
snac=0x100a3ca0, bs=0x19e) at bos.c:150
#9 0x0e93e040 in consumesnac (sess=0x1035c1b8, rx=0x1035be08)
at rxhandlers.c:138
#10 0x0e93e8c4 in aim_rxdispatch (sess=0x1035c1b8) at rxhandlers.c:525
#11 0x0e947adc in oscar_callback (data=0x10060ec4, source=8, condition=0)
at oscar.c:525
#12 0x10037558 in gaim_io_invoke (source=0x0, condition=G_IO_ERR,
data=0x100a1ff4) at proxy.c:205
#13 0x0f888478 in g_io_unix_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#14 0x0f863408 in g_main_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#15 0x0f86471c in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#16 0x0f864aa4 in g_main_context_iterate () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#17 0x0f8652dc in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#18 0x0fcd14b8 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 0x100a01c8 in main (argc=0, argv=0x0) at main.c:914
please fix that while I'm trying to educate my users to not be a pain/stereotype gentoo lusers.
To the reporter: Maybe if gaim wasn't such a unstable piece of shit, you wouldn't have people constantly asking you questions about why your software is ass. Luca Barbato: You don't happen to be using an architecture other than x86, do you? This has gotten a bit out of hand. I do not condone the original report, nor do I condone any of the inflammatory responses that were made by either side. This is blasphemy, and just proves there are people with way to much time on their hands. If you got a problem, don't bitch on bugzilla, we have better things to do then listen to your incessant whining. Simply adding this link to the GAIM docs should suffice: http://www.funroll-loops.org/ Ha. Ha. Ha. ROFL..... Created attachment 68484 [details, diff]
Removes support from the component causing the error.
This should be adequate to solve the problem listed above, although a
sanity-check on my syntax is probably in order.
*** Bug 124595 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
