| Summary: | Mail forwarding issues from membership-applications at gnome dot org to gentoo.org forward | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Mart Raudsepp <leio> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Gentoo Infrastructure <infra-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | ford_prefect, nirbheek |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
Mail headers of the missing mail as provided by the sender
Mail headers from the successfully received direct mail when by-passing gentoo alias |
||
|
Description
Mart Raudsepp
2011-02-12 17:34:39 UTC
Created attachment 262259 [details]
Mail headers of the missing mail as provided by the sender
Created attachment 262261 [details]
Mail headers from the successfully received direct mail when by-passing gentoo alias
The mail headers as seen in my INBOX from the mail re-sent directly to my inbox address - where gentoo dot org alias is supposed to forward. Only thing I can think of is Precedence: bulk header
We are delivering mail from gnome.org. Example: oodpecker mail # grep 71DF71B425A smtp.log.1 Feb 11 15:26:38 woodpecker postfix/smtpd[3731]: 71DF71B425A: client=menubar.gnome.org[209.132.180.169] Feb 11 15:26:38 woodpecker postfix/smtpd[3731]: 71DF71B425A: filter: RCPT from menubar.gnome.org[209.132.180.169]: <menubar.gnome.org[209.132.180.169]>: Client host triggers FILTER smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024; from=<ftp-release-list-bounces@gnome.org> to=<remi@gentoo.org> proto=ESMTP helo=<menubar.gnome.org> Feb 11 15:26:38 woodpecker postfix/cleanup[3813]: 71DF71B425A: message-id=<20110211152626.9CE282384FC@window.gnome.org> Feb 11 15:26:38 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[2631]: 71DF71B425A: from=<ftp-release-list-bounces@gnome.org>, size=3531, nrcpt=2 (queue active) Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/smtp[2671]: 71DF71B425A: to=<eva@gentoo.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=7.5, delays=0.68/0.02/0.01/6.8, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=04201-01, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as AACBD1B400F) Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/smtp[2671]: 71DF71B425A: to=<remi@gentoo.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=7.5, delays=0.68/0.02/0.01/6.8, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=04201-01, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as AACBD1B400F) Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[2631]: 71DF71B425A: removed woodpecker mail # grep AACBD1B400F smtp.log.1 Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/smtpd[2647]: AACBD1B400F: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/cleanup[3026]: AACBD1B400F: message-id=<20110211152626.9CE282384FC@window.gnome.org> Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[2631]: AACBD1B400F: from=<ftp-release-list-bounces@gnome.org>, size=3853, nrcpt=2 (queue active) Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/smtp[2671]: 71DF71B425A: to=<eva@gentoo.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=7.5, delays=0.68/0.02/0.01/6.8, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=04201-01, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as AACBD1B400F) Feb 11 15:26:45 woodpecker postfix/smtp[2671]: 71DF71B425A: to=<remi@gentoo.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=7.5, delays=0.68/0.02/0.01/6.8, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=04201-01, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as AACBD1B400F) Feb 11 15:26:46 woodpecker postfix/local[2698]: AACBD1B400F: to=<eva@gentoo.org>, relay=local, delay=0.6, delays=0.12/0/0/0.48, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail) Feb 11 15:26:47 woodpecker postfix/local[3824]: AACBD1B400F: to=<remi@gentoo.org>, relay=local, delay=2, delays=0.12/0/0/1.9, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail) Feb 11 15:26:47 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[2631]: AACBD1B400F: removed Return-Path: <apache@gnome.org> This address is fails SAV. host mail.gnome.org[209.132.180.169] said: 554 5.7.1 <apache@gnome.org>: Recipient address rejected: Spammer go away I've whitelisted it for now. Can someone help provide a technical blurb that we can give to GNOME infra team, so that they can fix the underlying issue? Their Return-Path/MAIL FROM envelope on those outbound mails is not a valid mail destination. This causes SAV to fail it. Return-Path must be a valid address for bounces to get delivered. |