| Summary: | [TRACKER] Evolution 1.5/2.0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Haplo <haplo> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | andreas.kotowicz, davi, ep, gentoo, mholzer, patrizio.bassi, simon, world.root |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD, Tracker |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2003-December/msg00030.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
libsoup-2.1.12.ebuild
gal-2.1.12.ebuild gcc-3.4.patch for gal libgtkhtml-3.1.18.ebuild evolution-data-server-0.0.96.ebuild evolution-1.5.91.ebuild |
||
|
Description
Haplo
2003-12-09 09:01:32 UTC
it depends on experimental libraries, you won't see this in portage for quite a while. can't reassign and close at the same time. doing it again. *** Bug 35466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 35666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 35567 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 35981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 37149 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** why not bump it into unstable tree ? first warning ~ != unstable NOTHING goes into ~ that isn't ready for stable. The only reason for ~ was to avoid ebuild incompabilities between working versions. its not "unstable". It shouldn't be. and if you treat it like that You should Stop AT Once and ..... *restrains himself* I'll leave it to others to flame you. Considering both 1.5 and 1.5.1 crash immediately on going tools->settings (meaning you cant edit accounts, set preferences.. generally set the thing up _at all_), even if by some miracle we saw if fit to put unstable series ebuilds in the tree, this _still_ wouldnt go in. Like I said on some other bug requesting 1.5, I'm following the series with local ebuilds, so we'll be ready to go when 1.6/2 is released (if foser isnt too). could you put the ebuilds to your public htmldir on dev box ? 1.5.2 is out Copied from the Evolution Roadmap.
---
July 12/04
* Evolution 2.0.0
* Evolution Data Server 1.0.0
---
This means that 2.0.0 is the next coming stable release and it is sheduled to the 12 of July....
...so I guess that there will be no new version of evolution in portage before that also meaning plp can stop asking for it until then, does it not?
*** Bug 55975 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 56626 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** i simply dunno what to write else! why? because in portage i see kde3.3.0_beta1 hardmasked and kde3.3.0_beta2 unstable!!! someone told me: we can't add evolution 1.5.9.x hardmasked because it needs 4-5 packages. and kde? kde has about 10-15 ebuilds! and a version, declared beta, is added as unstable. in portage there are lots and lots of cvs snapshot and betapackages, we can say that glibc and mplayer are only "unstable" and there are so many problem to add evolution...a simple pim. this is incredible. i'm so tired of us explaining ourselves with regards to pre-release software. we are not the same as the kde herd, or the kernel herds or the others. each herd has their own policy regarding what packages to release depending on their ability to keep up with the prereleases. kde herd believes that they have enough man power to handle prerelease versions of kde, but we don't believe we do. if you would like to be constructive here, i would appreciate if people actually submitted ebuilds of the required dependencies rather than complaining. i would be extremely happy to see that happen. Created attachment 36124 [details]
libsoup-2.1.12.ebuild
libsoup
Created attachment 36125 [details]
gal-2.1.12.ebuild
gal
Created attachment 36126 [details]
gcc-3.4.patch for gal
gcc-3.4.patch for gal
Created attachment 36127 [details]
libgtkhtml-3.1.18.ebuild
libgtkhtml
Created attachment 36128 [details]
evolution-data-server-0.0.96.ebuild
eds
Created attachment 36129 [details]
evolution-1.5.91.ebuild
evolution
gentoo devs please tear these ebuilds apart and help clean up where needed. Maybe we can use this bug to make sure evolution-2.0 goes into the tree looking good. If not maybe it will at least make liquidx happy for a moment. ok .. i'm impressed that someone responded with the right answer. now we're getting somewhere :) i've gone through the ebuilds with some corrections. i'll post something up soon. evolution 1.5.92.1 is now in portage along with various deps. it is hard masked. and also you've been warned, merging this will break evolution-1.4 because it conflicts with evolution-data-server. also there is no ximian-connector ebuild for 1.5.x atm. btw, we're using libgtkhtml-3.1.x because libgtkhtml-3.3.x is more unstable than unstable, and it requires gnome 2.8 components. I have an error building GAL with USE="doc", will look into it Here's the error: make[3]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/gal-2.1.13/work/gal-2.1.13/docs' cd . \ && gtkdoc-mkdb --module=gal-2.2 --source-dir=../gal Can't open ./gal-2.2-decl.txt at /usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkdb line 2596. It's because gal-2.2-decl.txt and gal-2.2-sections.txt don't exist, they're named gal-decl.txt and gal-sections.txt. Sorry I don't have more time to patch etc, gotta run. Will have to look at it later. evolution-1.5.91 won't give me an evolution-1.5 programm. the ebuild will just install the libs into /usr/lib/evolution/1.5/ |
