| Summary: | dev-cpp/mm-common-0.9.2: QA Notice: Automake "maintainer mode" detected | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Pacho Ramos <pacho> |
| Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | amigadave, flameeyes, galtgendo, gnome-mm+disabled |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=640635 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
build.log
patch that doesn't change a thing |
||
|
Description
Pacho Ramos
2011-01-26 13:17:16 UTC
Created attachment 260771 [details]
build.log
Well, it's a flaw of their build system. They've put an explicit sed for docdir and PACKAGE_STRING, instead of trusting configure to DTRT in AC_CONFIG_FILES and another explicit call to 'missing', instead of i.e AC_CHECK_PROG for tar. See Makefile.am. Rafal, I would really appreciate if you could provide a patch for this if you have time. Thanks a lot :-) Created attachment 275801 [details, diff]
patch that doesn't change a thing
The problem is I was a bit too optimistic - short story is that it seems to be a false positive of portage, that we simply need to live with.
See this patch - AM_MISSING_PROG(TAR, tar) results in the same string, that was before.
Unless the portage filter changes, the warning most likely stays.
(In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 275801 [details, diff] > patch that doesn't change a thing > > The problem is I was a bit too optimistic - short story is that it seems to be > a false positive of portage, that we simply need to live with. > > See this patch - AM_MISSING_PROG(TAR, tar) results in the same string, that was > before. > > Unless the portage filter changes, the warning most likely stays. Thanks for your help, will CC portage team then(In reply to comment #4) @Diego: Can you help us with this? I have no idea what the correct fix would be here. This is not the sole false positive unfortunately :( we should probably limit to ./missing --run auto(conf|make) to warn on. If this is a false positive, needs to be handled at package manager side Looks finally solved in 0.9.6 |