Summary: | CONFIG_PROTECT is not prefixed in make.globals | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo/Alt | Reporter: | Ruslan U. Zakirov <Ruslan.Zakirov> |
Component: | Prefix Support | Assignee: | Gentoo Prefix <prefix> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://portage.prefix.freens.org/prefix/rev/4733cb2bd831 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Ruslan U. Zakirov
2011-01-08 05:22:25 UTC
Do you have proof that it DOES NOT work as you think it should? If so, that would be news to me (and a regression) (There is magic behind the scenes so that CONFIG_PROTECT doesn't need to be prefixed) Sorry for bothering then. Most options containing a path have prefix, except this one. A comment in the file would clear things. CONFIG_PROTECT is on purpose not prefixed, because it is defined in the profiles, and hence cannot contain the right prefix. I'll add a comment. Thanks. |