| Summary: | net-fs/openafs-1.4.14 version bump | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Andrej Filipcic <andrej.filipcic> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Stefaan De Roeck (RETIRED) <stefaan> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | net-fs |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
openafs-1.4.14 ebuild
openafs-kernel.1.4.14 ebuild patches |
||
|
Description
Andrej Filipcic
2011-01-07 08:56:13 UTC
Created attachment 259119 [details]
openafs-1.4.14 ebuild
copy of openafs-1.4.12.1-r2.ebuild except for patch version 3
Created attachment 259120 [details]
openafs-kernel.1.4.14 ebuild
copy of openafs-kernel-1.4.12.1.ebuild with patch version 3
Created attachment 259121 [details]
patches
created from openafs-1.4.12.1-patches-2.tar.bz2, 012_all_kbuild.patch removed
Comment on attachment 259121 [details] patches this patch tarball has more differences from the CVS tree than one patch missing ... http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/openafs/patches/1.4/ I took this file as the base: http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/openafs-1.4.12.1-patches-2.tar.bz2 not sure how this is generated from cvs. In any case, kbuild patch can be removed. Oh, I see. It is done with make-tarball.sh. Then I guess it would be more consistent not to change the patches at all in cvs, but rather use the following in both ebuilds.
EPATCH_EXCLUDE="012_all_kbuild.patch" \
EPATCH_SUFFIX="patch" \
epatch "${WORKDIR}"/gentoo/patches
as in net-fs/openafs-1.4.12.1-r2.ebuild
so all of the new patches are fine for 1.4.14 ? Exactly. Please, ignore my patches tarball. ok, ive version bumped both |
