Summary: | sys-cluster/heartbeat-3.0.3-r2: emerge error | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Nicola Pavlov <pavlovnicola> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Cluster Team <cluster> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | pavlovnicola |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
build.log
3.0.3-as-needed_old_binutils.patch |
Description
Nicola Pavlov
2010-11-24 09:04:53 UTC
Created attachment 255289 [details]
build.log
You're mixing x86 with ~x86. I cannot reproduce that. You're mixing x86 with ~x86. I cannot reproduce that. (In reply to comment #3) > You're mixing x86 with ~x86. I cannot reproduce that. > I am afraid I did not understand. What should I do now in order to emerge hearbeat? I am afraid I did not understand what should I run in order to successfully emerge heartbeart. (In reply to comment #5) > I am afraid I did not understand what should I run in order to successfully > emerge heartbeart. > Since heartbeat fails due to undefined reference to `g_free', etc. I emerged glib 2.24.2 which is unstable (~x86) but still heartbeat fails to emerge. Created attachment 257230 [details, diff]
3.0.3-as-needed_old_binutils.patch
I got same error on one machine only. In my case there are produced by ld 1.19.1, related on position of -Wl,--as-needed on this line. binutils 1.21 not required this patch. (same patch for current heartbeat 3.0.4, other versions of binutils not verifyed)
Oneshot solution:
binuitils-config
or
emerge -1q ">=sys-devel/binutils-2.21" && emerge -Cq "<sys-devel/binutils-2.21"
(In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=257230) [details] > 3.0.3-as-needed_old_binutils.patch > > I got same error on one machine only. In my case there are produced by ld > 1.19.1, related on position of -Wl,--as-needed on this line. binutils 1.21 not > required this patch. (same patch for current heartbeat 3.0.4, other versions of > binutils not verifyed) What about stable binutils-2.20.1-r1? (In reply to comment #8) > What about stable binutils-2.20.1-r1? Good, no error. looks that it compiles in current stable setups |