| Summary: | sys-apps/mlocate config file /etc/updatedb.conf : prune FS hostfs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Toralf Förster <toralf> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) <fauli> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | base-system |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Toralf Förster
2010-11-15 15:23:27 UTC
[Removing slocate from Summary because it's package.masked and will be removed from the tree.] (In reply to comment #0) > I'm wondering whether "hostfs" should be added to the list of the file systems > ? I tend to agree. Anyone from base-system is against it? when requesting things like this, you really should describe the fs. ive never heard of "hostfs" before. assuming my google findings are correct, this is: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/hostfs.html in which case, adding hostfs to mlocate's default updatedb.conf is fine. feel free to add it. (In reply to comment #3) > when requesting things like this, you really should describe the fs. ive never > heard of "hostfs" before. assuming my google findings are correct, this is: > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/hostfs.html I'll do it next time (OTOH at least during the last month that file system produced some rumors at LKML: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20352 ) Added without revbump, thanks for the report. |