|Summary:||Stabilisation of xorg-server-1.9 and friends (NO DISCUSSION)|
|Product:||Gentoo Linux||Reporter:||Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) <scarabeus>|
|Component:||New packages||Assignee:||Gentoo X packagers <x11>|
|Severity:||enhancement||CC:||andrey.vihrov, axiator, bugzie, esigra, fauli, hauschild.markus, jan.bednar, junghans, orodruinlair, pacho, thomas.bettler, tomka|
|Package list:||Runtime testing required:||---|
|Bug Depends on:||305371, 336371, 341999, 344911, 347936, 348001, 348021, 348251, 349608|
|Bug Blocks:||332421, 348186, 354237|
x11 stabilisation list
x11 stabilisation list
Description Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) 2010-11-09 18:10:58 UTC
This is tracker bug that will be later on transformed to stablereq when we deal with all user reported issues. For more traceback informations please see: http://blogs.gentoo.org/scarabeus/2010/11/08/xorg-server-1-9-stabilisation/ Remember no comments on this bug, open new bugs describing your issues and make them block this one.
Comment 1 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn 2010-11-14 21:25:04 UTC
*** Bug 345447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) 2010-12-04 13:29:34 UTC
Created attachment 256310 [details] x11 stabilisation list To get usable keywords list from the list as the attachment: grep [myarch] x11_stable.list |cut -d' ' -f1 |sed -e 's:^:=:' > x11_stable_keywords.list Only package that might need to get stabilised and is not on the list is xf86-input-synaptics, i would ask some AT to confirm that and we can add that one on the list too (affect amd64 ppc ppc64 and x86)
Comment 3 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn 2010-12-04 14:09:51 UTC
Current stable xf86-input-synaptics-1.2.1 builds fine with xorg-server-1.9.2, so we can leave the decision about stabilization to the maintainer (bug 332421).
Comment 4 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn 2010-12-04 14:16:51 UTC
Arches, please stabilize the packages from the list in attachment 256310 [details].
Comment 5 Alex Buell 2010-12-05 02:10:35 UTC
Successfully built on my Sun Blade 2500, w/fbdev on XVR-500, tested and found to be working OK. Still waiting for my Ultra 60 to finish its build so I can test it.
Comment 6 Alex Buell 2010-12-05 15:33:54 UTC
Also tested on SPARC, Ultra 60, no problems.
Comment 7 Myckel Habets 2010-12-06 06:06:08 UTC
I've tried build all packages with all USE flags, some are failing on because of various reasons on x86. I'll have a look into this, this evening and post bugs where appropriate. I don't think most are blockers (some are due to my settings) One thing that I noticed, that might be a blocker: USE='doc' emerge -1 =x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.2 Calculating dependencies... done! !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=app-doc/doxygen-1.6.1" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - app-doc/doxygen-1.7.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - app-doc/doxygen-1.7.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - app-doc/doxygen-1.6.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - app-doc/doxygen-1.6.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - app-doc/doxygen-1.6.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) (dependency required by "x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.2" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "=x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.2" [argument]) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. There are currently 2 bugs (bug 338632 and bug 323647) for a newer, suitable doxygen, but none has gone through stabilization.
Comment 8 Myckel Habets 2010-12-06 21:11:57 UTC
Ok, I've posted all issues in new bugs: bug 347936 bug 347937 bug 347938 bug 347940 bug 347945 bug 347947 I'm now running xorg-server-1.9 for some time, that seems to be ok on x86.
Comment 9 Alex Buell 2010-12-06 21:50:35 UTC
Using doxygen 1.7.2 with xorg 1.9 on SPARC doesn't appear to pose any problems.
Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo 2010-12-07 17:40:11 UTC
I compiled all the packages in the list, the only bug I have found, at compile time is: bug 348053 I think it's a minor bug, if you want, feel free to add it to the list of packages that depend on. Anyway i found a conflict with actual stable nvidia-drivers, what about it?
Comment 11 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn 2010-12-08 15:19:54 UTC
Please only add regressions over currently stable x11 packages as blockers. Packages which are xorg-server 1.9 incompatible are not blockers, they should have their dependencies fixed.
Comment 12 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-12-19 13:16:04 UTC
ppc64 stable (except xf86-video-xgi because of bug 348001)
Comment 13 Antonio Quartulli 2010-12-22 01:07:57 UTC
Also here, on amd64, everything works fine. (with xf86-video-nouveau)
Comment 14 Alex Buell 2010-12-22 10:57:28 UTC
Can we have xf86-video-nouveau-pre20101130 and libdrm-4.2.3 stabilised? I'd consider these good enough to be used, programs such as celestia work quite well.
Comment 15 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn 2010-12-23 11:40:37 UTC
Created attachment 257855 [details] x11 stabilisation list Dropped vdpau-video from the list (no other changes) Regarding comment 14, libdrm-2.4.23 and xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.16_pre20101130 are in the middle of two API breaks, whether they will go stable at all is unclear at this time.
Comment 16 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-12-23 13:07:49 UTC
amd64 stable, enjoy
Comment 17 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-12-25 21:43:29 UTC
x86 stable, thanks for all the support.
Comment 18 Markus Meier 2010-12-29 22:39:40 UTC
Comment 19 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2010-12-31 21:02:15 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 20 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2011-02-13 11:23:08 UTC
Comment 21 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-02-15 00:04:37 UTC
ppc stable, last arch closing