Summary: | dev-lang/hugs98-2003.11.ebuild submission | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Peter Simons <simons> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Andres Loeh (RETIRED) <kosmikus> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | hugs98 Nov 2003 release ebuild |
Description
Peter Simons
2003-11-26 05:12:21 UTC
Created attachment 21308 [details]
hugs98 Nov 2003 release ebuild
haskell@gentoo.org isn't valid. I've committed your ebuild with very minor changes (additional dependency on docbook-dtd). I will try to ask someone about the PaX stuff. Do you know if there is a standard way to determine if PaX is installed on the machine? Is there a USE flag? Thanks for your help. Andres PaX is a kernel module, which has to be activated to do anything. There is no "installation" per se in the system, except for (maybe) the chpax(1) utility, which can be used to disable PaX. In short: I'm not aware of any way to test whether PaX is enabled. Maybe the hardened guys do know a way? Is there any progress concerning getting this ebuild marked as stable? Anything I may be able to help with? What is the problem that causes this ebuild to be marked "~x86" still after more than half a year? With 2005.3 being out and in portage, I guess this bug report can be considered invalid. ;-) |