Summary: | x11-libs/vdpau-video fails to build | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Alexis Ballier <aballier> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | esigra, flyser42, myckel, tomka, x11 |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Build log
quick and dirty ebuild for vdpau-video-0.7.3_pre2 buildlog of failing 0.7.2 and working 0.7.3_pre2 emerge --info of a system with working 0.7.3_pre2 Versions of x11-related packages |
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
2010-10-19 05:14:25 UTC
Created attachment 251201 [details]
Build log
Any news on this? I experience the same problem. This seems fixed in vdpau-video-0.7.3_pre2, please bump this package *** Bug 347945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #3) > This seems fixed in vdpau-video-0.7.3_pre2, please bump this package I don't know how you came to this conclustion. Here the error is exactly the same with the new version ... ? weird. 0.7.3_pre2 works for me (while 0.7.2 did not. I will attach my quick-and-dirty ebuild. maybe some of the quick or some of the dirt made it work. Created attachment 257141 [details]
quick and dirty ebuild for vdpau-video-0.7.3_pre2
Does not help here (your ebuild does not have any changes, the 'cd' are just needed because the ${S} variable is not set properly, but that does not matter). Can you confirm again that 0.7.2 does not work on exactly the same system? I would be of great help if you could post some more info about your system too, like emerge info of the system where you got it working + info about your X, mesa, ... versions? Thanks a lot! (In reply to comment #8) > Does not help here (your ebuild does not have any changes, the 'cd' are just > needed because the ${S} variable is not set properly, but that does not > matter). Can you confirm again that 0.7.2 does not work on exactly the same > system? yes, see my next attachment > I would be of great help if you could post some more info about your system > too, like emerge info of the system where you got it working + info about your > X, mesa, ... versions? > Thanks a lot! Sure, just a moment. Created attachment 257143 [details]
buildlog of failing 0.7.2 and working 0.7.3_pre2
Created attachment 257145 [details]
emerge --info of a system with working 0.7.3_pre2
Created attachment 257146 [details]
Versions of x11-related packages
The system is a Thinkpad T510 with both intel HD and Nvidia quadro NVS 3100M graphics. I am using a ~arch set of xorg packages
Ok. Nailed! We need a newer libva. With x11-libs/libva-0.31.1_p4 both 0.7.2 and 0.7.3_pre2 work for me. I still don't understand the difference you are observing. Thanks Fabian! @Alexis: Please confirm and update the dep at your earliest convenience to get xorg-stabilization going. (In reply to comment #13) > Ok. Nailed! We need a newer libva. With x11-libs/libva-0.31.1_p4 both 0.7.2 and > 0.7.3_pre2 work for me. I still don't understand the difference you are > observing. > Thanks Fabian! > > @Alexis: Please confirm and update the dep at your earliest convenience to get > xorg-stabilization going. > Still fails here for USE="-opengl" on x86. (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Ok. Nailed! We need a newer libva. With x11-libs/libva-0.31.1_p4 both 0.7.2 and > > 0.7.3_pre2 work for me. I still don't understand the difference you are > > observing. > > Thanks Fabian! > > > > @Alexis: Please confirm and update the dep at your earliest convenience to get > > xorg-stabilization going. > > > > Still fails here for USE="-opengl" on x86. Hmm, right. Same here. I thought I tested this. Same with 0.7.3_pre2, so we are back at the start :( Fabian, did you try USE="-opengl" ? (In reply to comment #15) > Hmm, right. Same here. I thought I tested this. Same with 0.7.3_pre2, so we > are back at the start :( Fabian, did you try USE="-opengl" ? Ohh sorry, I was confused by comment #2 in bug 347945. *** Bug 347945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** should be fixed with a patch in 0.7.3_pre2 |