Summary: | sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc94 prints wrong conflict atoms in "missed update" message | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Bernardo Costa <bernardofpc> |
Component: | Core | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 335925 | ||
Attachments: | Result of "emerge -vuDN world --pretend --debug", gzipped |
Description
Bernardo Costa
2010-10-14 13:53:57 UTC
There are some differences between what you wrote and what you pasted. The summary say it wants to downgrade to python-2.5, but your merge list contain 2.6.5. (In reply to comment #0) > I have replaced the line of /usr/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-5.35.ebuild > that said "=dev-lang/python-2.5[sqlite]" with "=dev-lang/python-2.6[sqlite]" > and it got out of the blocking list. The nmap-5.35 ebuild doesn't contain "=dev-lang/python-2.5[sqlite]", only ">=dev-lang/python-2.5[sqlite]" and there are no blockers in the output you pasted. Sorry for the double mistake. You're absolutely right about the version portage wants to downgrade to. And, as I have tested editing nmap, emerge -vauDN ; revert edit ; emerge -vauDN I have simply copied the bad one... thus with a standard portage tree this would downgrade from 2.6.6 to 2.6.5 (in my case, I have sage-on-gentoo overlay providing 2.6.5-r103, but otherwise I think it's juste 2.6.5-r3) and indeed I get (dev-lang/python-2.6.6-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with =dev-lang/python-2* required by (net-analyzer/nmap-5.35::gentoo, installed) along with the others. And the incriminated part of nmap-5.35.ebuild I have is (as you said, again) gtk? ( >=x11-libs/gtk+-2.6 >=dev-python/pygtk-2.6 || ( >=dev-lang/python-2.5[sqlite] >=dev-python/pysqlite-2 ) ) which shows that some strange thing is going into portage (as it says =python-2* just above). Perhaps some inherit is going there? Well, now I found out that indeed sage-4.5.3 requires CDEPEND=">=dev-lang/python-2.6.5-r99:2.6 ~dev-lang/python-2.6.5:2.6 so perhaps this is WHY portage does not want a 2.6.6 merged. If that's the case, then this should probably go to sage maintainers (for requesting 2.6.6 also good...). But anyway, portage should not show non-blockers such as =python-2* for python-2.6.6-r1, should it? So this remains a bug? (In reply to comment #2) > But anyway, portage should not show > non-blockers such as =python-2* for python-2.6.6-r1, should it? So this remains > a bug? > Agreed. Please create debug.log like this and post it: emerge -vuDN world --pretend --debug &> debug.log Created attachment 250613 [details]
Result of "emerge -vuDN world --pretend --debug", gzipped
Hopefully this helps: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=8f91b6615617af839a31e51bd3bb2048ea81ea56 For the moment I'm not labeling this as a regression because I doubt that portage-2.1.8.3 handles this any better. This is fixed in 2.1.9.19 and 2.2_rc97. |