|Summary:||app-arch/hardlink++ does not respect LDFLAGS|
|Product:||Gentoo Linux||Reporter:||Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes>|
|Component:||New packages||Assignee:||Robin Johnson <robbat2>|
|Package list:||Runtime testing required:||---|
|Bug Depends on:|
Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2010-09-14 09:20:10 UTC
See attached build log. (Please do not complain about the need for looking at the build log until you can provide an easy way to open bugs with the correct data picked out of a tinderbox log. Thanks.)
Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2010-09-14 09:20:33 UTC
Created attachment 247234 [details] Build log
Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2010-09-14 09:22:17 UTC
Any reason to keep this available rather than getting app-arch/hardlink keyworded for ppc? Would probably make it easier to maintain anyway, since it's not dead-upstream code.
Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-05-19 10:43:46 UTC
Diego, yes, you are right. I'm trying to figure out this mess. There are now: app-arch/hardlink at latest, it's from Debian app-arch/hardlink++, this package, completely dead, and upstream moved to Python and the new package is called hardlinkpy and it has no releases Then there is hardlink from Fedora which is also different: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=hardlink.git;a=summary With that said, I've still fixed this bug for now.