Bug 337250

Summary:	app-arch/hardlink++ does not respect LDFLAGS
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Robin Johnson <robbat2>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	QA	CC:	ssuominen
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	331933
Attachments:	Build log

Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-09-14 09:20:10 UTC

See attached build log.

(Please do not complain about the need for looking at the build log until you can provide an easy way to open bugs with the correct data picked out of a tinderbox log. Thanks.)

Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-09-14 09:20:33 UTC

Created attachment 247234 [details]
Build log

Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-09-14 09:22:17 UTC

Any reason to keep this available rather than getting app-arch/hardlink keyworded for ppc? Would probably make it easier to maintain anyway, since it's not dead-upstream code.

Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-05-19 10:43:46 UTC

Diego, yes, you are right.   I'm trying to figure out this mess.

There are now:

app-arch/hardlink at latest, it's from Debian
app-arch/hardlink++, this package, completely dead, and upstream moved to Python and the new package is called hardlinkpy and it has no releases
Then there is hardlink from Fedora which is also different:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=hardlink.git;a=summary

With that said, I've still fixed this bug for now.