Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 335876

Summary: SBLIM: Heap-based buffer overflow (CVE-2010-{1937,2054})
Product: Gentoo Security Reporter: Stefan Behte (RETIRED) <craig>
Component: VulnerabilitiesAssignee: Gentoo Security <security>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID    
Severity: trivial CC: ali_bush, java, jieryn
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3001896&group_id=128809&atid=712784
Whiteboard: ~2 [invalid]
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2010-09-03 21:04:27 UTC
CVE-2010-1937 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-1937):
  Heap-based buffer overflow in httpAdapter.c in httpAdapter in SBLIM
  SFCB before 1.3.8 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary
  code via a Content-Length HTTP header that specifies a value too
  small for the amount of POST data, aka bug #3001896.
Comment 1 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2010-09-03 21:47:34 UTC
CVE-2010-2054 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-2054):
  Integer overflow in httpAdapter.c in httpAdapter in SBLIM SFCB 1.3.4
  through 1.3.7, when the configuration sets httpMaxContentLength to a
  zero value, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service
  (heap memory corruption) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a
  large integer in the Content-Length HTTP header, aka bug #3001915. 
  NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Comment 2 jieryn 2010-09-06 01:47:12 UTC
This does not affect the dev-java aspect of SBLIM, which is the sum total of what this package provides. Closing as invalid.
Comment 3 Alex Legler (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-09-06 08:07:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> This does not affect the dev-java aspect of SBLIM, which is the sum total of
> what this package provides. Closing as invalid.
> 

Refrain from closing bugs assigned to security@ please (or generally any bugs that are not assigned to you). Feel free to make a comment, and *we* will take care of the closing after double-checking things.

In this case, we indeed don't have the software in portage. Adapting whiteboard.