Summary: | sys-apps/openrc-0.6.2 doesn't shut down wpa_supplicant | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Mikael <finstaden> |
Component: | [OLD] baselayout | Assignee: | OpenRC Team <openrc> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alon.barlev, mads, xmw |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | openrc:oldnet | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Mikael
2010-08-26 15:10:33 UTC
I can confirm this problem. Very annoying. Is that really necessary io ~ # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 stop * Bringing down interface wlan0 * Stopping dhcpcd on wlan0 ... [ ok ] * Running postdown ... io ~ # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start * Bringing up interface wlan0 * Running preup ... * Starting wpa_supplicant on wlan0 ... * start-stop-daemon: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant is already running [ !! ] * ERROR: net.wlan0 failed to start io ~ # killall wpa_supplicant io ~ # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start * Bringing up interface wlan0 * Running preup ... * Starting wpa_supplicant on wlan0 ... [ ok ] * Starting wpa_cli on wlan0 ... * start-stop-daemon: /usr/bin/wpa_cli is already running [ !! ] * ERROR: net.wlan0 failed to start io ~ # killall wpa_cli wpa_cli: no process found io ~ # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start * Bringing up interface wlan0 * Running preup ... * Starting wpa_supplicant on wlan0 ... [ ok ] * Starting wpa_cli on wlan0 ... [ ok ] * Backgrounding ... ... * WARNING: net.wlan0 has started, but is inactive io ~ # (In reply to comment #3) > Is that really necessary What exactly? hmm, and i thought i had broken something on my system to hit this problem check out the patch in Bug 266395 ... if you revert that, does it fix things for you guys ? http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/openrc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1a188f8f725186b2c2d6d7c67e79c2ff5ea9d05e (In reply to comment #5) > hmm, and i thought i had broken something on my system to hit this problem > > check out the patch in Bug 266395 ... if you revert that, does it fix things > for you guys ? > Yes. Reverting - Fixed. (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > hmm, and i thought i had broken something on my system to hit this problem > > > > check out the patch in Bug 266395 ... if you revert that, does it fix things > > for you guys ? > > > Yes. > Reverting - Fixed. I have reverted this patch in git, and I will do a new release shortly with this fix. |