| Summary: | www-plugin/adobe-flash should depend on nspluginwrapper for amd64 multilib | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Tim Bowers <djsmiley2k> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED) <lack> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | desktop-misc, djsmiley2k, xmw |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Tim Bowers
2010-08-06 19:26:23 UTC
As I mention in the elog output when you install 10.1 on an amd64 system:
...
Furthermore, there are stability problems when running 10.1 in a
64-bit browser with nspluginwrapper. The current recommended
configuration is to use a 32-bit browser such as
www-client/firefox-bin:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/324365
I am indeed toying with the idea of just saying "okay, everyone knows flash sucks but it sucks slightly less than the alternatives, so I'll just depend on nspluginwrapper anyway", but I have not yet been swayed.
But I have duly noted your vote implicit in filing this bug is duly noted. Thank you, I really do appreciate the feedback!
Keep trying to convince me it's a good idea to install an unstable configuration by default, and I may yet do it :)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 324365 ***
(In reply to comment #1) > As I mention in the elog output when you install 10.1 on an amd64 system: > > ... > Furthermore, there are stability problems when running 10.1 in a > 64-bit browser with nspluginwrapper. The current recommended > configuration is to use a 32-bit browser such as > www-client/firefox-bin: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/324365 > > I am indeed toying with the idea of just saying "okay, everyone knows flash > sucks but it sucks slightly less than the alternatives, so I'll just depend on > nspluginwrapper anyway", but I have not yet been swayed. > > But I have duly noted your vote implicit in filing this bug is duly noted. > Thank you, I really do appreciate the feedback! > > Keep trying to convince me it's a good idea to install an unstable > configuration by default, and I may yet do it :) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 324365 *** > Hi Jim, I just feel it should be clearer that IF you want to enable it, you NEED this package. Thats the bit I missed, and when asking in #gentoo they concidered it to be a bug, hense my filing it :) Ah, now I'm starting to understand. I'll update the elog message a bit to try to clarify it. Thanks again for the report. ... And as I was about to do so I had a change of heart and decided I'd just bring back nspluginwrapper as a (conditional) dependency... So take a look at adobe-flash-10.1.82.76-r1 and see if it does what you want (and is more clear if you don't have nspluginwrapper installed yet) |