Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 326723

Summary: app-portage/gatt assertion problem on x86
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Justin Lecher (RETIRED) <jlec>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Thomas Anderson (tanderson) (RETIRED) <tanderson>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: fauli, m.langer798
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on: 363927    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-03 09:36:46 UTC
# gatt -v -w 326073
+m+ running "bugz get 326073 -n -q"...
+i+ obtaining KEYWORDS from metadata-cache failed
+i+ trying to grab KEYWORDS from the ebuild directly
+i+ stored a temporary backup for /etc/portage/package.keywords
+i+ stored a temporary backup for /etc/portage/package.unmask
+i+ stored a temporary backup for /etc/portage/package.use
+m+ resolving masked dependencies...
+i+ obtaining KEYWORDS from metadata-cache failed
+i+ trying to grab KEYWORDS from the ebuild directly
+i+ temporarily appended "=sci-libs/ccp4-libs-6.1.3-r3" to /etc/portage/package.keywords
+m+ executing 'FEATURES="collision-protect test" /usr/bin/emerge -pq =sci-libs/ccp4-libs-6.1.3-r3 --ignore-default-opts'...
+i+ obtaining KEYWORDS from metadata-cache failed
+i+ trying to grab KEYWORDS from the ebuild directly
+e+ fatal error:
+e+   FailedAssertion:
+e+     where: package_manager.cc:267 in
+e+       void Gatt::<unnamed>::local::extractMaskedDependencies(const std::string&, std::vector<Gatt::Package, std::allocator<Gatt::Package> >&)
+e+     message:
+e+       assertion "package.getDefaultMask() == mask" failed !
+i+ /etc/portage/package.keywords has been successfully restored
+i+ /etc/portage/package.unmask has been successfully restored
+i+ /etc/portage/package.use has been successfully restored
+e+ if you think this is a bug, please report it here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gatt/


What do you need for debugging?
Comment 1 Matthias Langer 2010-07-15 18:11:56 UTC
I think this was fixed in SVN (revision 659) quite a while ago. Unfortunately my time is rather limited so I was hoping for an r1 release which obviously never happened. Can you please verify that app-portage/gatt-9999 does not suffer from the same problem? If so I'm going to make a new upstream release in the next few days, as there are a few other issues with the current stable version too.
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-05-22 15:42:54 UTC
Removed.