Summary: | sci-electronics/geda-1.4.1 fails to merge | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP <dhp_gentoo> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 10.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
/tmp/emerge--info
/var/log/portage/sci-electronics:geda-1.4.1:20100626-005222.log |
Description
DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP
2010-06-26 00:55:50 UTC
Created attachment 236573 [details]
/tmp/emerge--info
Created attachment 236575 [details]
/var/log/portage/sci-electronics:geda-1.4.1:20100626-005222.log
Thanks for testing and reporting. May I suggest to test the much newer (and in the meantime stable) geda-1.6.1 instead. I am using stable, and, unmasking 1.6 looks really more complicated than 1.4 . Amongst other things, autounmask -p ended up with *many* errors, and I gave up the manual way. (In reply to comment #4) > I am using stable, and, unmasking 1.6 looks really more complicated than 1.4 . > Amongst other things, autounmask -p ended up with *many* errors, and I gave up > the manual way. > As 1.6.1 *is* stable there should be no need for unmasking any more. It should work out of the box. Maybe you should update your tree? Or maybe I masked it because it could not merge in january ? would explain why autounmsk could not unmask it :) *NOW*, 1.6 seems installed. [ebuild R ] sci-electronics/geda-1.6.1 USE="doc examples nls threads -debug -stroke" 0 kB but 1.6 is (commented) in my package.mask, so, at some time it caused me trouble. |