Summary: | media-libs/mesa-7.8.2 fails to build: nouveau/nouveau_class.h: No such file or directory | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alec Meyers <alecm_88> |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | bircoph, esigra, kavol, patrizio.bassi, skrattaren |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | build.log |
Description
Alec Meyers
2010-06-18 01:17:22 UTC
Created attachment 235809 [details]
build.log
The same here. Actually applied to 7.8.1 too: although it was compilable when added to tree (I installed it on Apr 6), a few days ago I tried to re-emerge it due to libdrm update and it had failed with the same error. mesa's gallium use flag is masked for a reason. Downgrade to libdrm-2.4.20. > mesa's gallium use flag is masked for a reason. Well, nouveau is in main tree, and it forced gallium back in March. > Downgrade to libdrm-2.4.20. Thanks, that did the trick. Is it intended by upstream? Should it work with future mesa 7.9? I opted for turning off gallium. I modified the mesa ebuild to depend on libdrm-2.4.20 when nouveau is used. Apart from that, I am resolving this bug as INVALID as the gallium USE flag is masked on 7.8. sorry, i forced and built it with libdrm 2.4.21 with gallium and nouveau flag, on amd64 can you delete the .20 dep? What do you mean — "forced"? (In reply to comment #6) > sorry, i forced and built it with libdrm 2.4.21 with gallium and nouveau flag, > on amd64 > > can you delete the .20 dep? > kept 2.4.21, and emerged mesa Failed for me as before. (In reply to comment #8) > kept 2.4.21, and emerged mesa > *** Bug 339567 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 341877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |