Summary: | app-office/gnucash-2.3.12 needs gnome-extra/libgsf[gnome] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Torsten Veller (RETIRED) <tove> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gnome-office+disabled |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Nico Schlömer
2010-05-27 08:03:37 UTC
Okay, compiled gnome-extra/libgsf[gnome], and app-office/gnucash-2.3.12 installed just fine. Please update the dependencies accordingly. gnucash DEPENDS on >=x11-libs/goffice-0.6[gnome] and all goffice ebuilds RDEPEND on >=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome?]. So libgsf has to be installed with the gnome useflag to meet the requirements. Looks like INVALID to me. (In reply to comment #2) > gnucash DEPENDS on >=x11-libs/goffice-0.6[gnome] > and all goffice ebuilds RDEPEND on >=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome?]. > > So libgsf has to be installed with the gnome useflag to meet the requirements. I don't think so. One can install gnucash with gnome-extra/libgsf w/o [gnome] with no notification at all. Is that the "?" in gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome?]? (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > gnucash DEPENDS on >=x11-libs/goffice-0.6[gnome] > > and all goffice ebuilds RDEPEND on >=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome?]. > > > > So libgsf has to be installed with the gnome useflag to meet the requirements. > > I don't think so. One can install gnucash with gnome-extra/libgsf w/o [gnome] > with no notification at all. emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy ">=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome]". !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: - gnome-extra/libgsf-1.14.18 (Change USE: +gnome) (dependency required by "x11-libs/goffice-0.6.6" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "app-office/gnucash-2.3.12" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "gnucash" [argument]) > Is that the "?" in gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome?]? foo[bar?] means bar? ( foo[bar] ) !bar? ( foo ) http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/eapi/index.html If you USE=gnome for goffice then you must USE=gnome for libgsf too. (In reply to comment #4) > > If you USE=gnome for goffice then you must USE=gnome for libgsf too. Right. So when trying to pull in goffice, I also get Error searching for '>=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome?]': additional requirements are not met on 'gnome-extra/libgsf-1.14.18:0::installed' When installing gnucash, however, this error is not given at all. Is that a shortcoming of the package manager? (I use paludis.) How does portage behave? (In reply to comment #5) > So when trying to pull in goffice, I also get > > Error searching for '>=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.13.3[gnome?]': additional > requirements are not met on 'gnome-extra/libgsf-1.14.18:0::installed' > > When installing gnucash, however, this error is not given at all. Is that a > shortcoming of the package manager? (I use paludis.) How does portage behave? See comment #4. Can't help with paludis. Maybe it has a 25 character, 6 dashes option. |