| Summary: | Stable request for www-plugins/gnash | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jens-Uwe Peter <jup.coburg> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Romain Perier (RETIRED) <mrpouet> |
| Status: | RESOLVED LATER | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | chithanh, hwoarang, ssuominen |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Jens-Uwe Peter
2010-04-23 07:10:12 UTC
It is more than 30 days to tree so I guess it is ok to stabilize it. What do you guys think? gnash... stable? you have to be kidding. i'd keep it in ~arch few more years. I am still seeing stability and performance issues with gnash-0.8.7. The version which is presently under development appears to be shaping up nicely and could be a candidate for stable. I can not confirm stability issues. Although gnash is not feature complete, it performs better than adobe-flash on my machines (x86, amd64). And gnash is even more secure than adobe-flash. I opened a discussion (http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6256746.html) to get more opinions and see if there are great stability issues. |
