Bug 314533 (CVE-2010-0745) – <net-mail/dovecot-1.2.11: CPU exhaustion DoS through large header (CVE-2010-0745)

• Product: Gentoo Security
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Tomás Touceda (RETIRED) 2010-04-10 15:31:05 UTC]

This problem is only present with versions 1.2.x and it's fixed in 1.2.11:

- mbox: Message header reading was unnecessarily slow. Fetching a
  huge header could have resulted in Dovecot eating a lot of CPU.
  Also searching messages was much slower than necessary.
- mbox, dbox, cydir: Mail root directory was created with 0770
  permissions, instead of 0700.
- maildir: Reading uidlist could have ended up in an infinite loop.
- IMAP IDLE: v1.2.7+ caused extra load by checking changes every
  0.5 seconds after a change had occurred in mailbox

Is it ok for version 1.2.11 to go stable?

[Comment 1 Eray Aslan 2010-04-10 17:16:20 UTC]

dovecot-1.2.11-r1 is ready for stable.

Only concern is it was committed to the tree on April 7th and this is a minor issue.

Advice is welcome on gentoo policy whether this warrents foregoing "30 days before stabilization".  Patrick?

[Comment 2 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-04-14 04:50:14 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)

> Advice is welcome on gentoo policy whether this warrents foregoing "30 days
> before stabilization".  Patrick?

Eray, security issues should not wait. I see there is also bug 314103.

[Comment 3 Eray Aslan 2010-04-14 14:31:18 UTC]

Fair enough.

Arches, please test and mark stable:
=net-mail/dovecot-1.2.11-r1
Target keywords : "alpha amd64 sparc x86"

[Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-04-14 14:41:34 UTC]

*** Bug 314103 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 5 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-04-14 15:00:15 UTC]

x86 team: Stable host, upgraded to 1.2.11-r1 with no issues in my mail setup.

[Comment 6 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-04-14 17:03:31 UTC]

stable x86, thanks Jeremy, interested in a position as x86 AT? :)

[Comment 7 Benjamin Börngen-Schmidt 2010-04-16 12:00:07 UTC]

No problems so far on an amd64 platform

[Comment 8 Markus Meier 2010-04-18 11:57:39 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 9 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) 2010-05-03 09:45:03 UTC]

*ping* sparc

[Comment 10 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2010-05-07 18:21:41 UTC]

alpha/sparc stable

[Comment 11 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) 2010-05-22 11:05:37 UTC]

All arches done. Vote required, I vote NO.

[Comment 12 Dustin Polke 2010-06-06 08:56:01 UTC]

arm has keyworded dovecot-1.2.11-r1 as well. Please stabilize too. Thanks.

[Comment 13 Alex Legler (RETIRED) 2010-06-06 09:04:39 UTC]

(In reply to comment #12)
> arm has keyworded dovecot-1.2.11-r1 as well. Please stabilize too. Thanks.
> 

The package was never stable, NACK.

[Comment 14 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-07-14 16:03:37 UTC]

What is happening with ppc? They are still stuck at 1.1.19

[Comment 15 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) 2010-07-18 20:46:32 UTC]

I've marked the ppc builds ~ppc. In a few days, I'll mark the requested ebuild ppc stable, quickly due to the security issue. Sorry for the delay.

[Comment 16 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) 2010-08-01 12:44:42 UTC]

*ping*

[Comment 17 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) 2010-08-11 21:33:22 UTC]

Sorry, I forgot about this. Marked ppc stable.

[Comment 18 Tobias Heinlein (RETIRED) 2010-08-14 14:56:51 UTC]

I vote YES though.

[Comment 19 Tim Sammut (RETIRED) 2010-11-18 20:38:14 UTC]

GLSA Vote: Yes, with 286844.

[Comment 20 GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot 2011-10-10 20:25:15 UTC]

This issue was resolved and addressed in
 GLSA 201110-04 at http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201110-04.xml
by GLSA coordinator Stefan Behte (craig).