Summary: | x11-plugins/wmgrabimage should depend on || (media-gfx/imagemagick media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Wojciech Porczyk <wojciech> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Graphics Project <graphics+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | s4t4n |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 314431 |
Description
Wojciech Porczyk
2010-04-09 21:45:15 UTC
Sorry about the mass reassignment, but this undertaking really shouldn't burden bug-wranglers further. Have you actually tested this package against graphicsmagick? I am asking because I just tried that and, while the package does compile fine, it does not work for me. wmGrabImage -url http://www.hoteljasmin.com/diano-marina.jpg works fine when built against imagemagick fails when built against graphicsmagick stderr messages are: cat: /home/thorin/.wmGrabImage/diano-marina.jpg.tmp.xpm: No such file or directory rm: cannot remove `/home/thorin/.wmGrabImage/diano-marina.jpg.tmp.xpm': No such file or directory Make sure to rm -fr ${HOME}.wmGrabImage to clean up cached files when trying one or the other version No, I didn't. This bug is one of 114 bugs filed under same premise: it DEPEND (or RDEPEND) on imagemagick only. That could be correct. There is possibility that this bug is invalid. |