Bug 307847

Summary:	Please mark =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.32-r7 and =sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-2.6.32.9 stable
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Mike Pagano <mpagano>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers <kernel>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	ahipp0, andrey.vihrov, axiator, gentoo, nikoli, ppc64, rbergen, toon
Priority:	High	Keywords:	STABLEREQ
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	281999, 318531

Description Mike Pagano gentoo-dev

2010-03-05 01:44:53 UTC

Arch teams, please consider stabilizing =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.32-r7 and matching
=sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-2.6.32.9. No wide ranging issues exist at this time.

Comment 1 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-04-08 07:57:14 UTC

x86 stable

Comment 2 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-04-09 19:08:54 UTC

alpha/arm/ia64/sh/sparc stable

Comment 3 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-04-11 12:09:45 UTC

ppc stable

Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-04-12 18:37:18 UTC

Stable for HPPA.

Comment 5 Morgan GERMAIN 2010-04-14 16:00:38 UTC

what about amd64 ?

Comment 6 Brandon Holbrook 2010-04-20 14:34:16 UTC

It's stable on all of my amd64 boxes...

Comment 7 Andrey Vihrov 2010-04-20 15:04:17 UTC

(In reply to comment #6)
> It's stable on all of my amd64 boxes...

http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources says it's still ~amd64.

Comment 8 Brandon Holbrook 2010-04-20 17:56:00 UTC

(In reply to comment #7)
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources says it's still
> ~amd64.
> 

Yes I know... sorry for the ambiguous language.  I'm trying to provide evidence that it should be marked stable in portage.  My usage of the word "stable" was supposed to mean: "hasn't caught on fire or started any civil wars", not: "marked stable in portage". :)

Comment 9 Rutger van Bergen 2010-04-21 18:53:30 UTC

Are there any reasons not to mark it stable on amd64?

Comment 10 toon 2010-04-23 13:41:03 UTC

Hi guys, why is amd64 not declared stable yet?
I can't find any bug report which would explain it...

Comment 11 Rutger van Bergen 2010-04-24 17:39:37 UTC

The fact that the amd64 arch testers haven't replied at all seems to indicate that they haven't gotten round to considering stabilizing, or effectuating the stabilization they already know is appropriate. Either situation would be a shame, but as I don't want to perform any "armchair criticism" I will just wait for them to get round to it... :)

Comment 12 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2010-04-24 18:04:41 UTC

amd64 stable 

(Sorry for the delay, but there are many other packages to stabilize and we are not enough people to handle all requests)

Comment 13 Mike Pagano gentoo-dev

2010-05-19 14:46:03 UTC

I think that's all of them. Closing