| Summary: | Please stabilize dev-lang/swig-1.3.40-r1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) <tomka> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Panagiotis Christopoulos (RETIRED) <pchrist> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | arfrever, elvanor, scheme |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 283584, 291063, 318459 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 265054, 307297, 318467, 324283, 325727 | ||
|
Description
Thomas Kahle (RETIRED)
2010-03-03 13:24:14 UTC
*** Bug 310163 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I don't feel very comfortable with this stabilization. The tests fail without boost[python] and by default the build system enables a weird "ccache" support(which also makes tests to fail(I believe it has to do with its build system which uses variable names same with global portage variables)). Cause I 've never touched swig up to now, can someone reply if there is any need for the "usr/bin/ccache-swig" executable, or I can disable the stupid ccache support? I want to give some love to this package. By the way, don't know why it belongs to the scheme herd, I think it should belong to cpp herd or somewhere else. But lets fix it first. I pushed a new ebuild (swig-1.3.40-r1) in the main tree, with some minor changes, maybe we can stabilize that one if we don't have bugs in 30 days. OK, let's try. Please stabilize dev-lang/swig-1.3.40-r1. Some tests may fail, but it's ok, I believe. Builds fine on x86. No problems building and running rdeps encountered. Please mark stable for x86. What about bug #318459. Should we just ingore it? I'll do some tests tomorrow, and reply here with my findings. Wait for the time being, if you want. (In reply to comment #6) > What about bug #318459. Should we just ingore it? > It didn't fail for me on amd64. Please, proceed and we'll see where it goes. amd64 stable ppc stable Stable for HPPA. stable x86, thanks Myckel alpha, arm, ia64, ppc64, s390, sh, sparc teams, just a reminder. I want this done in order to cleanup the whole thing. ppc64 stable Stable on alpha. arm/ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable, closing |